Search Results for "hostile panch witness"

1332 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1332 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 144, 147, 148, 341, 114, 201 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Manjunatha and Prabhakar, were convicted by the Fast Track Court, KGF, for offences under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 447, 341, 114, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in MCOCA Case Due to Lack of Satisfactory Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under MCOCA and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove unlawful assembly and common object beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to multiple criminal appeals arising from a single incident where a group of individuals allegedly formed an unlawful assembly a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Reconsiders Appellant’s Murder Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence; Handwriting Expert Opinion Under Scrutiny. Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Challenged on Grounds That Chain of Circumstances Incomplete and Expert Evidence Not Corroborated.

The appellant, Vikas Ramdas Khairnar Patil, preferred a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against his conviction and life imprisonment for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Ganpat Shingade. The appellants, including his wife Jyoti, were convicted under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Appellants for Murder and Kidnapping in Gang-Related Killing. Life imprisonment confirmed for murder under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and kidnapping under Section 364 read with 34 IPC based on circumstantial evidence and witness testimony.

The Appellants, Balvindersingh Balvirsingh Rathod, Diljit Babusingh Labhana, Raina Asaraf Khan, and Bhalchandra Haridas Mahale, were convicted by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Padmakar s/o Warlu Alliwar, was a Gram Sewak/clerk in Grampanchayat, Palasgaon. He was convicted by the trial court in Special Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC, Acquits Co-Accused for Lack of Common Intention. Conviction based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence; acquittal of others due to absence of proof of common object under Section 149 IPC.

The case involves three appeals arising from a single judgment of the trial court. The appellant Ishwar Baliram Hude was convicted under Sections 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused in Murder Case Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC Established for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Family Land Dispute.

The case arises from a family land dispute between the Gholap family. The complainant and accused Nos. 1 and 2 are from the same original Gholap famil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeal by Convict Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 394 IPC for Murder and Robbery. The Court Examines the Admissibility of Test Identification Evidence and Recovery of Articles Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, original accused no. 1, under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of t...