Search Results for "eye-witnesses"

947 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 947 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Tulshiram Balaji Pupalwad, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Shankar Venkat Papulwad. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as dying declaration and eyewitness testimony found contradictory and inconsistent.

The present appeal was instituted by the appellants-accused, Dnyaneshwar Arjun Bhagwat (A-1) and Arjun Sakhahari Bhagwat (A-2), against the judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Abetment to Suicide Case — No Evidence of Instigation or Intent. Allegations of harassment and instigation under Sections 306, 354, 323, 504 IPC read with Section 34 IPC not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the judgment of acquittal dated 22.07.2017 passed by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Haveri (si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Lack of Common Object. Conviction under Section 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove unlawful assembly and common object beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to multiple criminal appeals arising from a conviction for murder under Section 302 read with 149, 120B, 147, 148 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rasiklal Makhanji Solanki, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Vidya Prabhudesai by pouring kerosene and setting her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 323, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Unlawful Assembly and Common Object.

The case involves four criminal appeals filed by Dnyaneshwar Thakare, Shivkumar Yadav, Virendra Kashyap, and Narendrasingh Takkal and Rambharose Malvi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Unreliable Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the incident arose from a sudden quarrel without premeditation, and the prosecution failed to prove murderous intent beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Akram Khan Sirajulhaq, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish the common object and individual overt acts beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by the original accused No.1 (Shafi Nabab Sayyed) and accused No.2 (Asim Jamaloddin Momin) challen...