Search Results for "extension approval"

1511 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1511 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty on Educational Institution for Excess Admissions in AICTE Case. Institution directed to pay balance penalty of Rs. 19.10 crore; students awarded degrees despite illegal admissions.

The petitioner, Foundation for Organizational Research and Education Fore School of Management, a registered educational institution, applied to AICTE...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Petitions for Regularization of Services of Bangalore University Employees. Petitioners Sought Formal Orders of Regularization Pursuant to Government Directives and Earlier Court Orders.

Multiple writ petitions were filed by employees working in various capacities at Bangalore University. The petitioners sought regularization of their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Appeal on Pay Revision for Retired Employees of HMT; Single Judge had set aside government order and directed extension of 1997 pay scale revision benefits to retired employees from 1st January 1997.

The appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge who allowed a writ petition filed by retired employees of HMT, a sick Central Public Secto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Tender Cancellation Dispute. Court holds that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and balance of convenience in its favor regarding the cancellation of tender acceptance and forfeiture of earnest money.

The appellant, Sunil Mantri Realty Limited, filed an appeal against the order dated 29.09.2009 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge Senior Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Naval Dockyard Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on extra work and escalation claims as plausible and not perverse under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arose from a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 3310 OF 2017

...