Search Results for "cadre and recruitment rules"

627 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 627 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's 2011 Pay Scale Order, Settles Long-Standing Litigation. Court Affirms Doctrine of Merger, Ensures Fair Compensation for Retired Employees, and Provides Finality to Pay Discrepancy Dispute

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a protracted litigation involving the State of Uttar Pradesh and its employees regarding the implementation of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Preference for Direct Recruit Assistants Over Non-Graduate Promotees in Tamil Nadu Revenue Subordinate Service. Rule Read Down to Exclude Graduate Promotees from Discrimination.

The case involves a dispute over the implementation of amended Rule 5(g) and Annexure-III item (ii) of the Tamil Nadu Revenue Subordinate Service Rule...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Selection Process in District Beed Recruitment Due to Malpractices. Selection Committee Has Power to Cancel Vitiated Process Even If Some Candidates Are Innocent.

The petitioners, four individuals who were selected for clerical and Talathi posts in a recruitment process conducted by the District Selection Commit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Translators' Writ Petitions for Pay Scale Revision - Equal Pay for Equal Work Principle Applied. Translators in Goa Legislature Secretariat entitled to Fifth Pay Commission scale of Rs.5500-9000 due to similar duties with other department translators.

The petitioners, Mr. Yuvaraj Naik and Smt. Blandina D'Sa, were translators employed by the Goa Legislature Secretariat. They filed writ petitions seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Respondent's Claim of Reduction in Rank, Holds Mere Reversion from Officiating Post Not Violative of Article 311(2) of the Constitution of India. The Court distinguished Vaikunthe's case, finding that reversion without permanent bar to promotion does not attract Article 311(2).

The case arose from the Southern Railway where the respondent, S. Raghavendrachar, was originally employed as a Train Examiner in the pay scale of Rs....