Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Translators' Writ Petitions for Pay Scale Revision - Equal Pay for Equal Work Principle Applied. Translators in Goa Legislature Secretariat entitled to Fifth Pay Commission scale of Rs.5500-9000 due to similar duties with other department translators.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 103
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Mr. Yuvaraj Naik and Smt. Blandina D'Sa, were translators employed by the Goa Legislature Secretariat. They filed writ petitions seeking a mandamus directing the respondents (State of Goa and the Goa Legislature Secretariat Board) to fix their pay scale at Rs.5500-9000 with consequential benefits, based on the extension of the Fifth Pay Commission recommendations by Government Order dated 27-10-1997. The facts revealed that the Fourth Pay Commission recommendations were adopted by the Government w.e.f. 1-1-1986, and two translator posts were created in the pay scale of Rs.1400-2300. Subsequently, the Fifth Pay Commission recommended higher scales, and the Government extended them to various employees. The petitioners argued that they performed identical work to translators in other government departments who received the higher scale, and thus were entitled to equal pay. The respondents contended that the petitioners' posts were governed by separate rules and the pay scale was fixed accordingly. The court analyzed the principle of equal pay for equal work and found that the petitioners' duties were similar to those of other translators. The respondents failed to provide any justification for the disparity. The court allowed the petitions, directing the respondents to fix the petitioners' pay scale at Rs.5500-9000 with consequential benefits from the date of the Government Order.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pay Scale - Equal Pay for Equal Work - Translators in Goa Legislature Secretariat claimed pay scale of Rs.5500-9000 based on Fifth Pay Commission recommendations - Court held that the petitioners performed same duties as translators in other departments who received higher pay, and the respondents failed to justify the discrimination - Held that petitioners are entitled to the revised pay scale with consequential benefits (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, translators in the Goa Legislature Secretariat, are entitled to the pay scale of Rs.5500-9000 as per the Fifth Pay Commission recommendations extended by Government Order dated 27-10-1997.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions and directed the respondents to fix the petitioners' pay scale at Rs.5500-9000 with consequential benefits.

Law Points

  • Equal pay for equal work
  • Pay scale revision
  • Government orders
  • Writ of mandamus
  • Pay Commission recommendations
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (04) 100

Writ Petition Nos. 68 and 72 of 2001

2006-04-03

A. P. Lavande, N. A. Britto

Mr. M. S. Sonak, Mr. Mandar Khandeparkar, Mr. S. Vahidulla, Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Mr. H. D. Naik

Mr. Yuvaraj Naik and Smt. Blandina D'Sa

State of Goa and Goa Legislature Secretariat Board

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions seeking mandamus for pay scale revision

Remedy Sought

Fixation of pay scale at Rs.5500-9000 with consequential benefits

Filing Reason

Denial of revised pay scale under Fifth Pay Commission recommendations

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to the pay scale of Rs.5500-9000 as per the Fifth Pay Commission recommendations extended by Government Order dated 27-10-1997.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they performed identical work to translators in other departments who received higher pay scale. Respondents contended that the petitioners' posts were governed by separate rules and the pay scale was fixed accordingly.

Ratio Decidendi

The principle of equal pay for equal work applies when employees perform similar duties without justification for disparity. The respondents failed to show any material difference in duties or responsibilities.

Judgment Excerpts

Both the translators of the Goa Legislature Secretariat are before this Court to seek a writ of mandamus... to fix their pay scale at Rs.5500-9000 with consequential benefits consequent to the extension of the pay scales of the Fifth Pay Commission by virtue of Government of Goa Order dated 27-10-1997.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa Legislature Secretariat Recruitment and Conditions of Service Rules, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Rejects Caveat Filed After Probate Grant Order in Testamentary Jurisdiction. Caveat filed under Rule 401 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 after order directing issuance of probate held not maintainable; proper remedy...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Retirement Without Sanction — Proceedings Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Violation of Regulation 16(3) of BESCOM/KPTCL CDA Regulations, 1975