Search Results for "Sales Tax Exemption"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Sales Tax Exemption"

412 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 412 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition to Quash SARFAESI Act Notices and Orders Against Guarantors Due to Lack of Proper Service and Non-Compliance with Section 13(2) Requirements. The court held that proper service of notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act is mandatory before taking possession under Section 13(4), and failure to prove service renders the entire action invalid.

17 Mar 2016

The petitioners, Shivabassappa I. Kankanwadi and his wife Sushila S. Kankanwadi, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act and Rule 8(4) of MCR Rules, 2016. Petition Seeks Execution of Mining Lease Deed and Challenges Orders of Union and State Governments.

18 Mar 2026

The petitioner, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (originally ABG Cement Ltd., later Vadraj Cement Ltd.), filed a writ petition befor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Land Allotment for Housing Society Due to Lack of Enforceable Right and Laches. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right to allotment of government land under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and the claim was barred by delay and laches.

23 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Pandurang Tukaram Kamble, as Chief Promoter of a proposed housing society, filed two writ petitions seeking allotment of 2.5 acres of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Recovery Officer's Confirmation of Private Sale. Court Holds That Once Sale Is Confirmed and Possession Delivered, Remedy Lies in Civil Suit for Damages, Not in Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

29 Nov 2011

The petitioners, Shaikh Gulab Shaikh Ahmed and Ambadas Maruti Kale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Earlier Judgment in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — No Contempt Made Out as Subsequent Transfers Were Not in Breach of Court Orders. The Court held that the earlier judgment did not contain any specific direction restraining transfers, and the respondents had acted under colour of subsequent orders from the DRT and High Court.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions filed by Celir LLP, the successful auction purchaser, alleging wilful disobedience of its earlier judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Show Cause Notices Issued Under Repealed Drugs (Prices Control) Order, 1979. Petition Challenges Recovery of Alleged DPEA Liabilities Arising Under Paragraph 7(2) of DPCO 1979 Post-Repeal, Alleging Violation of Articles 14, 265, and 300A.

22 Dec 2011

The writ petition was filed by Indian Drugs Manufacturers Association and Organization of Pharmaceutical Producers of India, acting on behalf of their...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Alleging State's Failure to Rehabilitate Project-Affected Persons. Court Examines Violation of Section 10 of Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999 and Right to Livelihood Under Article 21 Due to Incomplete Irrigation Canal.

2 Mar 2017

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Imported Textile Machinery — Holds That Show Cause Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 Is Time-Barred. The court quashed the show cause notice as the department failed to establish any fraud or suppression to justify the extended period of limitation.

20 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Karl Mayer STOLL Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH and M/s. Karl Mayer India Private Limited, imported textile machinery and cleared the goo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification Disputes — Cenvat Credit and Valuation Issues Decided. Classification of goods under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and eligibility for Cenvat Credit under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 determined based on functional use and technical literature.

30 Jul 2014

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification and Cenvat Credit Disputes. The court held that the definition of 'input service' under the Cenvat Credit Rules is broad and classification of goods must be based on predominant function and commercial understanding.

30 Jul 2014

The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders...

30 31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)