Search Results for "Regulatory Compliance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Regulatory Compliance"

613 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 613 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mandatory Bodies, Emphasizes Union's Obligation Under Article 256. Non-Compliance with Welfare Legislation Leads to Summoning of Chief Secretaries for Explanation.

1 Aug 2026

The case arose from a public interest litigation filed by Swaraj Abhiyan (V) concerning the non-implementation of the National Food Security Act, 2013...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension of Hockey Players in Sports Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. Suspension Order Issued by Hockey Karnataka Without Proper Inquiry and Without Authority Under National Sports Development Code, 2011 and Hockey India Bye-Laws.

8 Jul 2026

The petitioners, seven hockey players, were suspended by Hockey Karnataka (the first respondent) via a letter dated 18.06.2026. The petitioners challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Debarment from Examination Due to Attendance Shortfall. Court Refuses to Interfere with Educational Institution's Attendance Policy Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Holding That Minimum Attendance Requirement Is a Valid Academic Criterion.

30 Jun 2026

The petitioner, a student, challenged the decision of the respondent educational institution debarring him from appearing in examinations due to failu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Co-operative Housing Society's Writ Petition Challenging Registrar's Order to Register Third Party as Member. Registrar's order quashed for lack of jurisdiction as membership dispute must be adjudicated by Co-operative Court under Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

9 Dec 2025

The petitioner, a co-operative housing society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, challenged an order dated 30th Septe...

High Court

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 984 of 2018

18 Jun 2025

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India in Jurisdictional Dispute Over Trial of IBC Offences. Held that Reference to Special Court under Chapter XXVIII of Companies Act, 2013 in Section 236(1) IBC is Legislation by Incorporation, Not Affected by Subsequent Amendment.

29 Apr 2024

The appeal arises from a challenge by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court quashing the o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging SCEA Directive Excluding Retired Employees from Voter List in Salary Earner's Co-operative Bank Elections. Directive Issued Without Authority Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and Bye-laws Permitting Retired Members to Vote Must Be Respected.

21 Jun 2023

The petitioners, Nashik Zilla Sarkari and Parishad Karmachari Sahakari Bank Ltd. (a salary earner's co-operative bank) and some of its retired employe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction on Communidade Land in Ribandar-Chimbel Area — Holds That Petitioners Failed to Establish Encroachment on Public Property or Violation of CRZ Norms. The court found that the petitioner society lacked locus standi and the construction permissions were validly granted.

16 Jun 2023

The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Ribandar Chimbel Rakhon Samiti, a registered society, challenging construction ac...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Planning Authority in Fee Revision Dispute — Revised Charges for Infrastructure and Premium FSI Upheld. The Court held that liability to pay charges arises at the time of grant of planning permission, not at the date of application, and authority can revise demands based on revised rates prevailing on the date of permission.

29 Jul 2019

The case involves a dispute between the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) and Prestige Estates Project Ltd. regarding the revision of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

30 31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)