Search Results for "Open University System"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Open University System"

454 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 454 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Effective Implementation of Tree Protection Act in Pune - Mandates Constitution of Tree Authority with NGO Representatives and Appointment of Adequate Tree Officers. The court held that the Tree Authority must include non-official members with expertise, and compensatory plantation of 10 trees per tree cut is mandatory under Section 8 of the Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Protection and Preservation of Trees Act, 1975.

20 Sep 2013

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Deepak Balkrishna Vahikar and another petitioner seeking effective implementation of the Maharashtra (Urb...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears State of Maharashtra's Appeals Against High Court's Decision Striking Down Section 33A of Bombay Police Act, 1951 as Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The core issue is whether the prohibition of dance performances in eating houses, permit rooms, or beer bars is a reasonable restriction on trade and is within the State's legislative competence.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra and others assailing the judgment and order dated 12th April 2006 o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Banks' Appeals in RBI Fraud Classification Case Regarding Natural Justice Requirements. Court Holds No Absolute Right to Personal Hearing or Full Forensic Audit Report Disclosure Under RBI Master Directions Issued Under Section 35A Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

7 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from the classification of loan accounts as 'fraud' by banks under the Reserve Bank of India's Master Directions. The appellant bank...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Judgment Invalidating Co-operative Society Bye-laws on Maintainability and Validity Grounds. Writ Petitions Under Article 226 Were Not Maintainable Against Private Co-operative Societies as No Statutory Duty Was Breached and Alternative Remedy Existed Under the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 2001, and the Bye-laws Prescribing Eligibility Conditions for Election Contests Were Held Valid Under Section 8 Read with Schedule B.

10 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from writ petitions filed by Primary Milk Producers' Co-operative Societies challenging the validity of certain bye-laws framed by D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Validity of TUFS Guidelines and Export Obligation Extension Policy. Court upholds Textile Commissioner's power to impose conditions for extension of export obligation period under Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme (TUFS) and holds that guidelines are not ultra vires the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves four writ petitions filed by textile exporters challenging the validity of guidelines issued by the Textile Commissioner under t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Family Court Judge in Public Interest — Rule 10(4) Pension Rules Invoked Without Sufficient Material. Court holds that compulsory retirement under Rule 10(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 read with Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008 requires a subjective satisfaction based on relevant material, and mere pendency of disciplinary proceedings or adverse entries without a review committee recommendation cannot sustain the order.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Chitra Bhedi, was a Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur. She was compulsorily retired in public interest by an order dated 3rd Octob...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Family Court Judge in Public Interest — Rule 10(4) Pension Rules Invoked Without Sufficient Material. Court holds that compulsory retirement under Rule 10(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 read with Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008 requires formation of opinion based on relevant material and cannot be passed mechanically or without application of mind.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Chitra Bhedi, was a Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur. She was compulsorily retired in public interest by an order dated 3rd Octob...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Hears Challenge by Additional Government Pleaders and Public Prosecutors Against Termination Clause in Fresh Appointment Advertisement. Court Examines Whether Clause 7 of 13.03.2015 Advertisement Amounts to Illegal Termination in Violation of Maharashtra Law Officers (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1984, and Article 14 of Constitution of India.

5 May 2015

The petitioners, functioning as Additional Government Pleaders, Assistant Government Pleaders, and Additional Public Prosecutors in the High Court of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Indian Courts Lack Supervisory Jurisdiction Over Arbitration Seated in Colombia Governed by Colombian Law.

18 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Disortho S.A.S., a Colombian company, and the respondent, Meril Life Science Private Limited, an Indian company, entered into an Inter...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Involving COVID-19 Vaccine 'COVISHIELD'. The court restrained defendants from using the mark 'COVISHIELD' or any deceptively similar mark for pharmaceutical products, finding a prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

5 Jun 2023

The plaintiffs, Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendants, Yohan ...

30 31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)