Search Results for "Majority rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Majority rule"

2345 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2345 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Second Appeal Against Decree for Possession in Minority Property Case — Permission Under Section 8(2) Hindu Minority Act Required. Mother's Sale of Minor's Property Without Court Permission Held Voidable; Burden of Proving Legal Necessity Not Discharged by Purchaser.

4 May 2018

The original plaintiffs filed a suit for possession and mesne profit against the appellant, claiming that the sale deed executed by their mother durin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Sanction of Scheme of Arrangement Amid BIFR Pendency. Maintainability Under Sections 391 and 394 of Companies Act, 1956 Against Overriding Effect of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Considered.

8 Nov 2006

The petitioner, Ashok Organics Industries Ltd., incorporated in 1973, filed a petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Preliminary Objection on Applicability of Section 392 of CrPC vs Clause 36 of Letters Patent in MCOCA Appeal. Division Bench Equally Divided on Discharge of Accused in Telgi Stamp Case; Issue Raised Whether Third Judge Must Decide Only Points of Difference or Hear Entire Appeal.

14 Jul 2010

The proceedings concerned an appeal filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2016

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

10 Nov 2016

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

High Court

KAHC010069912016_1

10 Nov 2016

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Teachers Appointed by Linguistic Minority School, Holds Rule 28 of West Bengal Management Rules Inapplicable to Minority Institutions Under Article 30. The Court ruled that minority institutions have the right to appoint teachers of their choice, and Rule 28 of the 1969 Rules does not apply to them.

25 Sep 2019

The appeals arose from a dispute over the appointment of teachers at Khalsa Girls High School, a school established for Punjabi-speaking Sikhs in Calc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Vires of Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 Amidst Concerns Over Judicial Independence. Petitioners Argue That Provisions on Appointment, Tenure, and Removal of Tribunal Members Undermine the Constitutional Balance of Power.

1 Jan 1970

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions challenging the vires of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021. The petitioners, led by the Madras Bar Assoc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Industrial Tribunal's Award Holding Section 9A Notice Illegal for Unilateral Change in Vacation Leave Encashment Calculation. Management's change from 30-day divisor to 26-day divisor for computing daily wage for leave encashment held to be a change in service conditions requiring notice under Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

4 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Management of Bharat Earth Movers Ltd. (BEML), a Public Sector Undertaking, challenged the award dated 11.09.2013 passed by the Indust...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

12 Mar 2014

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...

30 31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)