WRIT PETITION NOs. 4198 2005, 564 2009, 804 2002,
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Municipal Acts"
1214 result(s) found
Found 1214 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Parking Space Regulations Under UDCPR in Navi Mumbai. Court holds that UDCPR provisions are statutory and binding, and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any illegality or public interest violation.
22 Dec 2023The petitioner, Sandeep Thakur, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging the parking space regulations under the ...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Suit Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata. Appellants' challenge to 1965 acquisition notification filed in 1992 held time-barred under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 and earlier writ petition dismissal operates as res judicata.
29 Nov 2016The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit in 1992 seeking declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of two suit properties bear...
- 221
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Dual Proceedings on Cooperative Housing Society Dispute Over Change of User and Structural Alterations. The Court Examines Legality of Converting Residential Flats to Nursing Home and Making Additions Without Consent Under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.
5 May 2006The matter involved two consolidated proceedings: a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Maharasht...
- 29
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Anticipatory Bail in Building Collapse; Alleged Negligent Chipping of Columns Not Causa Causans According to Applicant. Licensee Seeks Pre-Arrest Bail, Contending No Gross Negligence and Exoneration by Municipal Committee Reports.
11 Oct 2013The matter involved an anticipatory bail application filed by Sundeep Bafna before the High Court of Bombay. The applicant had taken the underground a...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Declaring Reservation Lapsed Under MRTP Act for Failure to Acquire Land Within 12 Months of Purchase Notice. Land Reserved for Parking Released as Authorities Took No Steps After Purchase Notice Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
4 May 2023The petitioners, owners of land bearing CTS No. 352 & 352A, Final Plot No. 131/1, 131/2 in Nashik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Non-Development of Land Reserved for Garden in Development Plan. Reservation of land for public purpose does not automatically lapse upon non-development within plan period; landowner must be given opportunity to develop or be compensated under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966.
10 Oct 2023The petitioners, Runwal Township Pvt. Ltd. and its director Kishorkumar Jain, owned land in Mumbai that was reserved for a garden in the Development P...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses PIL Seeking Ban on Cow Slaughter in Goa — State Legislation Permits Slaughter of Bulls and Buffaloes, No Fundamental Right to Food of Choice Violated.
30 Dec 2020The Bombay High Court at Goa dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Govansh Raksha Abhiyaan-Goa, Akhil Vishwa Jai Sriram Gosanvardhan K...
- 258
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes BBMP Endorsement and Defence Ministry Letter Restricting Construction Near Defence Establishment — Executive Guidelines Cannot Override Statutory Rights Under Article 300A and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The court held that the Works of Defence Act, 1903 occupies the field and any restrictions must be imposed under its provisions, not through executive guidelines.
29 Aug 2023The petitioners, Jambo Plastics Pvt. Ltd. and Merushikhar Infra LLP, owned property in Bangalore. They sought to construct a building and obtained a l...
- 88
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Doctors' Petition to Quash PCPNDT Act Notification for Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to issue show cause notice and provide hearing before suspending registration under Section 17(2)(3) of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994 renders the notification illegal and unsustainable.
17 Jul 2026The petitioners, Dr. Niraj Kadam and Dr. Rekha Kadam, are doctors running a hospital in Wardha, Maharashtra. They challenged a notification dated 16.3...
- 24
