Search Results for "Letting Out"

766 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 766 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Retrospective Application of Section 157 Amendment in Land Reforms Dispute. Simultaneous Amendment of Section 157(1)(a) Read with Section 21(h) of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951, Given Retrospective Effect to Avoid Frustrating Legislative Intent.

The dispute pertained to the status of Sukhram Singh and Laiq Singh as Adhivasis or Asamis under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.

The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order in Landlord-Tenant Dispute Under U.P. Urban Building Act. Tenant Granted Opportunity to Contest Eviction on Payment of Costs, Directed to Cooperate for Early Disposal.

The appellant-landlord filed a petition under Section 21(i)(a) of the U.P. Urban Building (Control of Letting of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.1930 OF 2011

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Ejectment Suit — Maintainability of Suit Without Rent Controller Permission Upheld. Lease Agreement for Fixed Term Not Requiring Notice Under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The case involves a second appeal by the defendant, Shankar s/o Ratiram Bhure, against the decree of ejectment passed by the trial court and confirmed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Second Appeal in Eviction Suit for Bonafide Need of Landlords. Concurrent Findings of Fact on Bonafide Requirement Cannot Be Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Vijay Shrihari Khandar, was a tenant in a part of a house bearing No.31 C.T.S. 2035, Sheet No.8 at Ramtek, owned by the respondents, Sh...