Search Results for "Inclusion"

1806 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1806 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitration Award in Property Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award based on joint family property partition and limitation, finding no patent illegality or perversity.

The petitioners, who were members of a joint family, challenged an arbitral award passed in a partition dispute. The award had been made by an arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Writ Petition Challenging Exclusion from Panel for Dean Post in Government Medical Colleges. The Court Observes that the Main Ground for Non-Consideration Is That the Petitioner Lacked Requisite Teaching Experience as Per Special Rules.

Background: The petitioner, a medical professional, sought inclusion in the panel for the post of Dean in Government Medical Colleges for the year 202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition in Pension Case, Upholding Tribunal's Inclusion of Past Commission Bearer Service. Consistent with Supreme Court's Munshi Ram, All Railway Employees Must Receive Equal Pension Benefits Without Zone-Based Discrimination.

The case concerned a service dispute over the pensionary benefits of a railway employee who had previously worked as a Commission Bearer. The responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Constitution Bench Examines Applicability of Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 to Foreign-Seated Arbitrations. Reference Arises from Conflicting Views in Bhatia International and Venture Global Engineering.

The Supreme Court of India, by a reference order dated 16 January 2008, directed the listing of Civil Appeal No. 7019 of 2005 and connected matters be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Challenge to Fringe Benefit Tax Provisions. Petitions question constitutional validity of Chapter XII-H of Income Tax Act, 1961 as violative of Article 14 and beyond legislative competence.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard three writ petitions filed by M/s T.T.K. Prestige Ltd. and another, M/s N. Rangarao & Sons, and Karnata...