Search Results for "Hindu Succession Act, 1956"

417 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 417 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that plaintiff failed to prove title and possession, and that the suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sub Judge, Chengalpattu, in A.S. No.12 of 2001, which modified t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeals Against Vacation of Temporary Injunction in Property Partition Dispute. Grandchildren Seek Share in Ancestral Properties Alleging Attempts to Alienate Suit Properties.

The matter pertains to two appeals filed against the order of the XIV Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, dated 26 September 2019, in Original Sui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Sale Deed of 3/7th Share Validly Executed by Co-owners in Favour of Plaintiff, and Defendant's Possession as Tenant Is Not Adverse to Plaintiff's Title.

The appellant, original defendant No. 1, filed a second appeal against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the first appellate court in a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Favor of Executor Despite Allegations of Suspicious Circumstances. Will executed by testatrix with firm signature and solicitor-drafted formality upheld as valid under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The plaintiff, Chittaranjan N. Negandhi, sought probate of a Will dated 24th May 1973 left by his mother, Bhanumati Narottamdas Chapsi. Bhanumati died...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Appellants' Claim for Share in Joint Family Property Upheld. Court holds that daughters are entitled to equal share in coparcenary property under Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as amended in 2005, and that the suit was not barred by limitation.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment a...