Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Inheritance Dispute — Widow of Predeceased Son Not Entitled to Inherit from Father-in-Law Under Hindu Succession Act. The court held that the widow of a predeceased son is not a Class I heir under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and thus cannot claim inheritance from her father-in-law.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 162
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court at Goa arising from a suit filed by the respondents claiming inheritance of properties owned by the father-in-law of respondent no. 1. The appellant, Laxmibai Narayan Prabhu (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), challenged the lower courts' decisions. The facts are that respondent no. 1, Medha Naguesh Prabhu, is the widow of Naguesh Prabhu, who died in 1984. Her father-in-law, the owner of the suit properties, died in 1992. The son (Naguesh) predeceased his parents. The respondent claimed to be an heir of her father-in-law. The substantial question of law framed was whether the widow of a predeceased son is an heir of her in-laws and entitled to inheritance. The court, after hearing arguments, noted that under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the heirs of a male Hindu dying intestate are specified in Class I of the Schedule. The widow of a predeceased son is not listed as a Class I heir. The court relied on the plain language of the statute and held that the widow of a predeceased son cannot inherit from her father-in-law. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the judgments of the lower courts were set aside, and the suit was dismissed. The court answered the substantial question of law in the negative, holding that the widow of a predeceased son is not an heir of her in-laws.

Headnote

A) Hindu Succession Act - Class I Heirs - Widow of Predeceased Son - Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - The widow of a son who predeceased his parents is not a Class I heir of her father-in-law under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The court held that the widow of a predeceased son does not fall within the list of Class I heirs and thus cannot inherit from her father-in-law. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the widow of a son, who has predeceased his parents, is an heir of her in-laws and entitled to inheritance of the in-laws' property.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Judgments and decrees of the lower courts set aside. Suit filed by the respondents dismissed. Substantial question of law answered in the negative.

Law Points

  • Hindu Succession Act
  • 1956
  • Section 8
  • Class I heirs
  • widow of predeceased son not an heir of father-in-law
  • inheritance of in-laws
  • predeceased son
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (03) 226

Second Appeal No. 41 of 2013

2017-03-21

F. M. Reis, J

2017:BHC-GOA:807

Shri M. B. D'costa, Senior Advocate with Ms. K. Betquekar for Appellants; Mr. A. D. Bhobe with Ms. S. Bhobe for Respondents no. 2, 3(a) and 3(b)

Laxmibai Narayan Prabhu (since deceased) through legal heirs

Smt. Medha Naguesh Prabhu and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Second appeal against concurrent findings of lower courts in a suit for declaration of inheritance and partition.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought dismissal of the suit claiming that respondent no. 1, widow of predeceased son, is not an heir of her father-in-law.

Filing Reason

Respondent no. 1 claimed to be an heir of her father-in-law and entitled to inherit his properties.

Previous Decisions

Trial court and first appellate court decreed the suit in favor of the respondents.

Issues

Whether the widow of a predeceased son is an heir of her in-laws under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the widow of a predeceased son is not a Class I heir under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and thus not entitled to inherit from her father-in-law. Respondents contended that the widow of a predeceased son is an heir of her father-in-law.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the widow of a predeceased son is not a Class I heir of her father-in-law and therefore cannot inherit from him.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether the widow of a son, who has predeceased his parents, is not an heir of her in laws and, consequently, is not entitled to the inheritance of the in laws? The learned Senior Counsel further submits that the husband of the Respondent no. 1 expired in the year 1984 and her father-in-law expired in the year 1992 and the said son also predeceased his mother.

Procedural History

The suit was filed by the respondents in the trial court, which decreed the suit. The first appellate court confirmed the decree. The appellants then filed the present second appeal, which was admitted on 29.08.2013 on the substantial question of law.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Succession Act, 1956: Section 8
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Deaf and Dumb Minor Under POCSO Act — Birth Certificate and Anganwadi Records Sufficient to Prove Victim's Age Below 18 Years. The court held that minor corrections in records do not und...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision That Forward Contracts Not in Prescribed Form Are Illegal and Void. Non-Compliance with Mandatory Bye-Laws Under Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 Renders Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable.