Search Results for "Common Guidelines 2008"

908 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 908 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Plaintiff's Writ Petition Under Article 227 Challenging Refusal of Ex-Parte Appointment of Commissioner in Injunction Suit. Trial Court Directed to Reconsider Application for Appointment of Commissioner on Merits Considering Urgency and Irreparable Loss.

The petitioner, Newspace Research and Technologies Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Division Bench Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Municipal Corporation's Power to Regulate Hoardings on Railway Property. Petitions seek declaration that Railway Properties exempt from local authority jurisdiction under Railways Act, 1989.

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India (Western Railway) and numerous private advertising entities. The pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Maharashtra Stamp Act Amendment on Advertisements. Petition Seeks Declaration that Imposition of Stamp Duty on Mass Media Advertising Contracts is Unconstitutional and Void.

The Advertising Agencies Association of India and several other entities representing advertising, newspaper publishing, and broadcasting sectors file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Lift Installation Contracts Are 'Works Contract' or 'Sale of Goods' for Sales Tax Purposes. The Matter Was Referred to a Larger Bench to Resolve Conflict Between Prior Rulings and to Determine the Applicability of the Predominant Intention Test After Recent Judgments.

The matter stems from multiple writ petitions and civil appeals challenging the classification of contracts for manufacture, supply and installation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution of Directors for Delayed TDS Deposit Under Section 276B Income Tax Act — Delay Not Equivalent to Failure to Pay. Vicarious Liability Requires Specific Averments of Being In-Charge and Responsible; No Notice Under Section 2(35) or Order Under Section 201(1) Passed.

The petitioners, directors of M/s. Hubtown Ltd., challenged the issuance of process against them under Section 276B r/w 278B of the Income Tax Act, 19...