Search Results for "urban land"

1818 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1818 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeals in Property Dispute. Court upholds concurrent findings that appellant failed to prove title and possession over suit properties, finding no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Basavaraj Basavanneppa Pattan, filed six second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Examines Validity of Ahmedpur Development Plan Notification Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Core Issue Involves Mandatory or Directory Nature of Section 26(1) Timeline and Permissible Limits of Extension Under Third Proviso.

The case involved three writ petitions filed by landowners in Ahmedpur, District Latur, challenging a notification dated 29.03.2012 published on 08.05...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Designation Under Section 69(2) of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 — Petitioner Failed to Show That Designation Was Made Under Master Plan-2031 or That Land Was Not Acquired Within Five Years.

The petitioner, Sri Narayanaswamy, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengalur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Jaipur Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Conversion Charges Refund Case — Land Use Change Required Payment Under Section 173-A of Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959. Court Holds That Conversion Charges Were Validly Demanded and Respondents Not Entitled to Refund.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the Jaipur Municipal Corporation against a Division Bench judgment of the Rajasthan High Court that dire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Rent Control Jurisdiction Case — Decree Passed After Act's Applicability Is Void. Civil Court Loses Jurisdiction Once Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 Applies to Area; Decree Passed Thereafter Is Void Ab Initio.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the tenant-appellants against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which had dismissed their revisi...