Search Results for "taxing provision interpretation"

366 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 366 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore Hears Appeals by Telecom Companies Against Income Tax Department on TDS Liability. Multiple Appeals Filed Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 Challenging ITAT Orders for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2008-09.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of Income Tax Appeals filed by telecom companies under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 196...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Penalty Under Section 10(b) of CST Act for Alleged Misuse of C-Forms. The Court Examined Whether Penalty is Leviable When Goods Were Covered in Registration Certificate and There Was No Dishonest Intention.

The combined proceeding involved appeals and revision petitions against orders relating to penalty under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Two dealers,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Legality of Penalty Imposed Under Section 10(b) of CST Act for Misuse of C-Forms in Cement Industry. Court Examines Whether Penalty is Sustainable When Purchased Goods Are Included in Registration Certificate and Used for Purposes Other Than Manufacturing.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, heard a sales tax appeal and connected revision petitions concerning the levy of penalty under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows BSNL's Petition Against MSEDCL for Wrongful Tariff Categorization Under Electricity Act, 2003. Telecom Service Provider Cannot Be Classified as 'Commercial' for Electricity Tariff Purposes; MERC Must Determine Correct Category.

The Petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a telecom service provider and a central public sector enterprise, filed a writ petition under Artic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Manufacturer for Refund of Octroi Duty on Imported Chemical Intermediate. Sulphonic Acid, a Raw Material for Detergents, Not Covered Under Entry 18 of Schedule H to the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 as It Is Not a Substance Used in Washing.

The petitioner, Hindustan Lever Limited, a manufacturer of soaps and detergents, imported Sulphonic Acid, a toxic chemical intermediate used as raw ma...