Search Results for "sentence concurrent"

725 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 725 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Adoption Dispute — Adoption Deed Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 11 of Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. Actual Giving and Taking of Child Not Proved, Rendering Adoption Invalid.

The appellant, Smt. Parvathamma, filed a suit in O.S.No.277/1989 before the Principal Munsiff and JMFC, Tumkur, seeking a declaration that the first r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Disclosure Statement and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction under Sections 392 and 397 IPC Set Aside as Recovery of Common Articles and Hostile Witnesses Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appeal arose from a robbery case where the appellant was convicted under Sections 392 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) by the Trial Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Bank Manager in Embezzlement Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Criminal Conspiracy and Misappropriation of Funds

The appellant, N. Raghavender, was the Branch Manager of Sri Rama Grameena Bank, Nizamabad Branch from May 1990 to September 1995. He was convicted by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Death by Negligence — Confirms Concurrent Findings of Guilt Under Sections 279 and 304A IPC.

The revision petitioner, Kishor N, was convicted by the Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court IV, Bengaluru, in C.C.No.7848/2018 dated 30.04.2022 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act for Selling Adulterated Groundnut Oil. Conviction and Sentence of 3 Months RI and Fine of Rs.1000 Upheld as Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Disturbed in Revision.

The applicant, Santoshkumar Ramchandra Rathi, was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wardha, on 17.9.1999 in Regular Criminal Cas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Upheld. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The petitioners, accused Nos.1 and 2, were convicted by the LVII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall unit, Bengaluru in C.C.No.53439/2...