Search Results for "self acquired property"

1079 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1079 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Dismissing Petition. Court Frames Questions on Applicability of Section 111A and Section 43A of Companies Act, 1956 to Deemed Public Company.

The appeal arose from a company petition filed by the appellants, members of the Kavasmaneck family, before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, alleging op...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Reverses Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Held that the plaintiffs failed to prove joint family property and that the suit was barred by limitation and res judicata.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the plaintiffs (respondents) against the defendan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition Filed Against Collector's Order Disqualifying Councillors Under MLAMD Act for Breach of Party Whip. High Court Considers Validity of Disqualification Based on Formation of Aghadi, Resignation, and Voting Contrary to Directions.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by four councillors of Mahur Nagar Panchayat challenging the order of the Collector, Nanded, dated 31-0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Property Declaration Suit — Upholds Trial Court Decree Based on Adverse Possession and Valid Title. Concurrent findings of fact regarding possession and title cannot be disturbed in appeal without substantial error.

The case involves two Regular First Appeals (RFA No.429/2003 and RFA No.506/2003) filed against the judgment and decree dated 13.1.2003 passed by the ...