Search Results for "section 66(1)"

348 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 348 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Appeals of Occupants Challenging Eviction from Comunidade Land — Appellants Failed to Prove Title or Authorisation, Eviction Upheld Under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC and Section 38 Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The case involves five first appeals filed by Ayub Khan, Khurshida Ahmad, Salim Sandhi, Mehmood A. Ansari, and Dadapir Lohar against the State of Goa,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Court Award in Retrenchment Case — Termination of Trainee on Contract Expiry Not Retrenchment Under Section 2(o) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Sharad Vishwas Bhamre, was appointed as a trainee by the respondent, Mahindra & Sons Limited, on 2 April 1990 for a period of one year...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Claimants' Appeal in Railway Accident Case, Enhances Compensation for Death of Anil Jindal. Negligence of Railway Administration Established as Train Hit Deceased at Unmanned Level Crossing Without Warning.

The case arises from a railway accident at an unmanned level crossing in Jalna, where a train hit a vehicle driven by Anil Jindal, resulting in his de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused in Murder Case Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony — Knife Blows Inflicted on Deceased Near Hospital Gate Established Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Rohtas and Surender Singh, upholding their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder of Wife Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Including Motive, Last Seen Together, and Recovery of Weapon Held Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Mangesh Rajaram Sawant, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay for the murder of his wife Noori @ Manisha on 29...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Appellant Entitled to Cenvat Credit on Input Services. Definition of 'Input Service' Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is Broad and Includes Services Having Nexus with Manufacturing Business.

The appellant, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited, is a manufacturer of motor vehicles and parts, registered under the Central Excise Act. It file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Legality of Unreasoned Decision on Notary Application. Collector's Omission to Provide Reasons Raises Issue Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Surekhaben Chhaniyabhai Varli, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicatur...