Search Results for "section 397"

1285 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1285 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Caveat in Testamentary Case — Caveators' Rights Protected Despite Procedural Lapse. Court holds that caveat filed after petition for Letters of Administration is maintainable and delay in lodging caveat can be condoned under Section 148A of CPC.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the applicants, who are the legal heirs of Mr. Adhip Lal Barua (predeceased son of the deceased Captain M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Robbery and Grievous Hurt with Deadly Weapon in Beedi Shop Incident. Appellant's conviction under Sections 394 and 397 IPC confirmed based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

The appellant, Rajan Ramchandra Haldankar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.638 of 1996 for offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Income Tax Department's Appeal Against Acquittal in Section 276CC Income Tax Act Case. Court Restores Proceedings for Trial on Merits, Holding That Magistrate Erred in Closing Case Without Considering Evidence.

The Income Tax Department filed multiple criminal appeals under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against an order dated 03.04.2021...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 378(4) CrPC in Section 138 NI Act Case - Appeal Against Acquittal in Private Complaint Lies Under Section 378(4) CrPC, Not Proviso to Section 372 CrPC

The case involved a reference to a larger bench to resolve a conflict regarding the maintainability of an appeal against acquittal in a prosecution un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Tribunal Correctly Held Commissioner Not Justified Under Section 263 for Alleged Double Deduction of Excise Duty. Assessing Officer Followed Permissible View and Assessee Did Not Claim Deduction Twice.

The present appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (I...