Search Results for "search and seizure before FIR"

590 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 590 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Appeal by Accused Convicted under Section 302 IPC for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Trial Court Convicted the Accused Based on 12 Circumstances Including Extrajudicial Confessions and Discovery of Dead Body.

The appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 02/09/2009 by the Additional Sessions Judge-I, South Goa, Margao in Sessions Case No.6/2008 convict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Destruction of Evidence in Circumstantial Evidence Case. Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Incriminating Articles Sufficient to Convict Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Ashish Burange, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, for the murder of Pushpa Pande, a 59-year-old spinster and r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rajesh Kumar Yedurajsingh Bhadoriya, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No. 302/2010 for the murde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Berry Fruit Quarrel Murder Case. Sudden Fight Without Premeditation Attracts Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, Reducing Offence from Murder to Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder Under Section 304 Part I IPC.

The appellant, Avinash Datta Chavhan, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Pusad in Sessions Trial No. 11/2017 for offences under Sections 304 and 506...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Wife and Paramour for Murder of Husband Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Circumstantial evidence including ligature marks, recovery of weapon, and extra-judicial confession established guilt beyond reasonable doubt under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.

The case pertains to the murder of Ganesh Motiram Sakpal, husband of appellant Ashwini Ganesh Sakpal (accused No.1). The prosecution alleged that Ashw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Criminal Revision Petitions Challenging Rejection of Default Bail and Cognizance in NDPS Case. Court’s Analysis Focuses on Maintainability Under Section 397 CrPC and Application of Precedents.

The judgment of the High Court of Karnataka arises from two criminal revision petitions filed by the accused No.3, challenging the orders of the Speci...