Search Results for "reopening notice"

599 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 599 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Proper Application of Mind. Notice and Order Set Aside as Show Cause Notice Did Not Disclose Reasons for Reopening Assessment Beyond Four Years.

The petitioner, Anand Kumar Somasheshekarayya Lonarmath, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act Due to Change in Law After Finance Act, 2021. Notice Issued Under Old Regime Held Invalid as Proceedings Must Conform to Amended Provisions, with Liberty to Initiate Fresh Proceedings.

The petitioner, Nitinkumar S/o Rishiram Agrawal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 31.03...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Assessment Nullity Case Due to Amalgamation. Assessment in Name of Non-Existent Entity Held Void Despite Participation by Successor Company.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which had upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petition Against Reopening of Assessment Without Speaking Order on Objections. Assessing Officer's Failure to Pass Speaking Order on Objections Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Vitiates Subsequent Proceedings.

The petitioner, The Goa State Coop. Bank Ltd., challenged the refusal of the Assessing Officer to pass a speaking order on objections raised by it aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment after four years invalid as reasons recorded did not allege any failure by assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts.

The petitioner, ICICI Bank Ltd., challenged a notice dated 30 March 2010 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 148 of the Inco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years. Inordinate Delay and Violation of Natural Justice Render Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Madan Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Div...