Search Results for "possession and rent arrears"

774 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 774 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Civil Revision Petition Against Concurrent Eviction Orders Under Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960. Tenant Challenges Eviction on Grounds of Willful Default, Denial of Title, and Demolition and Reconstruction.

The matter arose from a civil revision petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 before the High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Estate Officer’s Jurisdiction Under PP Act Against SARFAESI Possession. Asset Reconstruction Company Asserts SARFAESI Act Overrides PP Act, Requiring Landlord to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal.

The writ petitioner, an Asset Reconstruction Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and registered under the SARFAESI Act, challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Clarification and Declares CGST Rule 31A(3) Ultra Vires in Favor of Turf Clubs. GST Liability on Betting Amount Limited to Commission Retained, Not Entire Totalisator Collection, Under CGST Act, 2017.

The two writ petitions were filed by Bangalore Turf Club Limited and Mysore Race Club Limited, companies conducting horse racing and facilitating bett...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Challenge to Order Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Rent Suit. Issue Concerning Classification of Decree Under Order 9 Rule 6 or Order 8 Rule 5 CPC Remains Unresolved in Incomplete Judgment.

The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenged an order of the Small Causes Court, Bombay, which had set aside an ex-parte decree ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Eviction Decree in Partnership Property Dispute. Concurrent findings of fact that defendants were licensees, not tenants, upheld under Article 227.

The petitioners (original defendants) were a partnership firm occupying premises owned by the respondent (original plaintiff) partnership firm. Initia...