Search Results for "ordinance amendment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "ordinance amendment"

511 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 511 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds State's Power to Appoint CEOs Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Rules, 2014 — Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Appointments Quashed. The court held that the appointments were valid under Rule 4 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Appointment of Chief Executive Officer) Rules, 2014 and the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction.

27 Dec 2016

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions and civil applications challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) which set ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Contempt Conviction Against Officials in Agricultural Produce Levy Case Due to Lack of Willful Disobedience and Improper Fact-Finding in Contempt Proceedings. High Court Erred by Examining Evidence and Imposing Liability When a Committee Was Constituted to Decide Disputed Facts Under the Assam Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1972.

26 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a contempt conviction by the High Court against officials for willful disobedience of its order regarding cess levy under the As...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Development Charges Demand on Nazul Land for TDR-Based Construction — No Legal Basis for Levy Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code or Nagpur Land Rules. The court held that the Nazul Tahsildar cannot demand development charges for NOC to sell flats constructed using TDR on nazul land as there is no statutory provision authorizing such levy.

1 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Sunil Thapar, owner of nazul Plot No.94 in Ramdaspeth, Nagpur, entered into a development agreement with M/s Raghav Life Spaces on 22 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Pre-deposit Condition Under SARFAESI Act — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 18 Provisos. The court held that the legislature may condition the right of appeal and the provisions are not discriminatory compared to the RDB Act.

1 Jul 2011

The petitioners, National Polymers and others, challenged an order dated 6 April 2011 of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal directing them to depos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

19 Dec 2006

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging RBI Circular on Resolution of Stressed Assets. Circular dated 12.02.2018 held to be valid and within RBI's powers under Sections 35A and 35AB of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

8 Mar 2018

The petitioners, Jayaswal Neco Industries Limited and Jayaswal Holdings Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Sale Deed Validity — Restores Trial Court Decree Based on Benami Transaction and Adverse Possession Findings. The Court held that the sale deed executed by defendant no. 3 in favour of defendant no. 1 was benami and void under Section 4(1) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, and that the defendants failed to prove adverse possession.

1 Jan 2026

The present appeal arises from a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) concerning 13...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Appeal and Dismisses Foreclosure Suit Due to Improper Joinder and Limitation Bar. Court Reverses High Court's Addition of Plaintiffs and Defendants Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC as the Added Parties' Claims Were Time-Barred Under Section 22 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908.

18 Apr 1966

The dispute arose from a mortgage executed in 1934 in the former State of Hyderabad. The mortgage amount became due in 1943. The first respondent, cla...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Public View. Anticipatory Bail Granted as Alleged Casteist Abuse Occurred at Accused’s Residence Without Public Presence, Not Attracting Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act, 1989.

24 Aug 2020

The criminal petition was filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking anticipatory bail for the two petitioners who were ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Enemy Property Tax Exemption Case — Property Tax Levyable on Lessee Despite Union Ownership. Article 285(2) of Constitution Enables Municipal Corporation to Impose Property Tax on Lessee of Union Property Even if Union Itself is Exempt Under Article 285(1).

22 Feb 2024

The present civil appeal arises from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which allowed a writ petition filed by the respondent-assessee, holding th...

29 30 31 32 33

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)