Search Results for "management wrong"

1478 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1478 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenges to State Guidelines on Appointment of Pollution Control Board Chairman. Court Considers Whether Executive Guidelines Violate Water Act and Binding Supreme Court Precedent.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of eight writ petitions, six of which were filed in public interest litigation jurisdiction. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Order Holding Suit for Modification of Trust Scheme Not Maintainable Before Persona Designata. The District Judge as Persona Designata Does Not Have Jurisdiction to Amend the Scheme Framed Under Section 92 CPC; Such Suits Must be Filed in Civil Court.

This writ petition arises from a challenge to the order dated 5 December 2024 passed by the President of Shree Dnyaneshwar Maharaj Sansthan, Alandi, P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Reviews Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice Against Employer for Denying Permanent Status to Temporary Workers. Court Examines Whether Completion of 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Model Standing Orders Mandates Confirmation.

This batch of writ petitions was filed by Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. and one employee before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging a common...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Judgment That Struck Down Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Notifications Under Environment (Protection) Act. Review Petition Seeks Recall Citing Overlooked Binding Precedents.

Background: The present matter is a review petition arising from the Supreme Court's judgment in Vanashakti v. Union of India, dated 16 May 2025, whic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in National Green Tribunal Act Case Upholding Illegal Storage Facility Removal. Ex Post Facto Clearance Under 2011 Notification Invalid as Storage Terminal Not Located 'In' Notified Port Under Paragraph 8 of Environment Protection Act, 1986.

The appeals were lodged under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, challenging the National Green Tribunal's order that set aside an e...