High Court of Karnataka Examines Government Order on Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration. Dispute Pertains to Control and Management of Temple as per Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "incorrect statement"
3043 result(s) found
Found 3043 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Rape and Sodomy Case under IPC Sections 376(2)(f), 377, 506. Conviction Based on Sole Testimony of Child Victim Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Mother's Testimony Under Section 157 Evidence Act; Minor Discrepancies in FIR Held Immaterial.
7 Aug 2017The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Ramesh Bansiram Pawar, by the Adhoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Nashik, in Sessions Case No. 154 ...
- 17
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to FIR Against Income Tax Officials: Sections 138 and 293 Income Tax Act Protection Argued. Court Examines Whether Notice Under Section 91 Cr.P.C. Can Override Statutory Safeguards in Search and Seizure Cases.
25 Nov 2021The writ petition was filed by income tax authorities under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Petitions to Quash FIR No.311 of 2012 and Complaint C.C.No.410/SW/2012 Alleging Abuse of Process and False Implication in Matrimonial Dispute. Petitioners seek quashing under Article 226, claiming original complainant lodged false complaint in retaliation to an earlier FIR filed against her family in Punjab.
14 Oct 2013The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the order dated 9th October 2...
- 31
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Motion to Set Aside Arrest of Vessel in Admiralty Suit: Arrest of M.V. Rainbow Ace Challenged on Ground of Non-Establishment of Common Beneficial Ownership Between Vessel Owner and Defaulting Charterer. Defendant Vessel Owner Asserts No Common Beneficial Ownership with Charterer, Seeking to Vacate Ex-Parte Arrest Order in Maritime Claim for Damages Under Voyage Charterparty.
6 May 2013In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Admiralty and Vice Admiralty jurisdiction, the applicant, owner of the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, filed a not...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Trial Court's Rejection of Witness Summons to Adversary in Partition Suit. Trial Court's Order Upheld That a Party Cannot Call Its Adversary as Its Own Witness Under Order XVI Rule 1 and Rule 21 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
4 Oct 2021The litigation arose from a suit for partition, possession and perpetual injunction instituted by the original plaintiffs, whose predecessor Digambar ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Sessions Court Order Setting Aside Summons in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 NI Act. Unregistered Partnership Firm's Complaint Under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Not Barred by Section 69(2) Indian Partnership Act and Magistrate Need Not Hold Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC When Accused Reside Outside Jurisdiction if Complaint Verified on Oath.
6 Oct 2021The matter arose from a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by the applicant partnership firm through...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reinstates Disciplinary Action Against Bank Officer for Misconduct Under UCO Bank Regulations. Charges of Opening Accounts Without Introduction and Deviating from Cash Procedures Were Specific and Inquiry Followed Due Process, Upholding Penalties Under Regulation 3 of UCO Bank Officers Employees’ (Conduct) Regulations, 1976.
18 Feb 2022The dispute arose from disciplinary proceedings against a bank officer of UCO Bank for alleged misconduct while serving as an officiating Manager. A c...
- 397
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Acquisition Cases — Non-Grant of Solatium and Interest Upheld. The Court held that Section 3J of the National Highways Act, 1956, excluding solatium and interest under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
3 Sep 2019The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), considered the validity of t...
- 387
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Land Acquisition Cases — Section 3J Not Violative of Article 14. The Court held that the non-grant of solatium and interest under the National Highways Act, 1956 is not discriminatory and the Act is a complete code.
9 Aug 2019The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India, considered the validity of the non-grant of solatium and interest under the Nati...
- 272
