Search Results for "customs adjudication"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "customs adjudication"

690 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 690 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.

3 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Revalidation of DFIA Licenses Due to Availability of Statutory Alternative Remedy. Petitioner failed to avail appeal remedy under Section 9(5) of Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 within prescribed period.

10 Apr 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Oriental Export Corporation, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the resp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 — Held That Seizure Without Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 105 of the Act Requires Show-Cause Notice Before Confiscation.

10 Oct 2018

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by owners of vehicles that were seized by the State Excise Department under Section 105 of the M...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax CENVAT Credit Dispute — Re-insurance Service Held Not Eligible as Input Service Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Court held that re-insurance is not used in the course of providing the output service of insurance and thus does not qualify as input service under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

9 Apr 2015

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise against an order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) wh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Assault Case Under Sections 323 and 324 IPC; Rejects Defence of Issue Estoppel Based on Prior Section 107 Cr.P.C. Proceedings. Earlier Finding of No Proof in Preventive Proceedings Does Not Bar Criminal Trial for Specific Offence Where No Prior Trial or Conviction/Acquittal Existed.

28 Nov 1968

The appeal arose from criminal proceedings in which two respondents were convicted under Sections 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for causi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Whether an Authorised Dealer Compliant with RBI's FLM Instructions Can Be Held Liable under Sections 6(4) and 6(5) of FERA; Maintainability Not Disputed Despite Co-Noticees' Failure to Appeal.

14 Oct 2010

This matter concerns two appeals filed under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) before the High Court of Bombay, challenging an order of the A...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition on Interest on Refund Under Goa VAT Act — Interest Payable from Date of Assessment Order Determining Refund. Section 33(2) of the Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005 mandates interest from the date the amount became refundable, which is the date of the assessment order, not the date of actual refund.

16 Oct 2019

The petitioner, United Spirits Ltd. (formerly McDowell and Co. Ltd.), a registered dealer under the Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005, filed returns for t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against CESTAT Remand Order in Central Excise Refund Claim — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Tribunal's Remand for Fresh Adjudication with All Issues Kept Open Does Not Give Rise to Appealable Question Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944.

8 Oct 2013

The appellant, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., filed a refund claim under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Assistant Commissioner ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Stay Order in Cenvat Credit Dispute. Tribunal's Detailed Findings at Stay Stage Prejudge the Appeal and Are Impermissible.

4 Mar 2015

The appellant, CEAT Limited, filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 12th June 2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Two Writ Petitions Regarding Caste Certificate Validity and Promotion in Municipal Corporation. The Court Considered Whether a Validity Certificate Issued by Nashik Scrutiny Committee After an Earlier Invalidation by Pune Scrutiny Committee Was Valid.

29 Apr 2010

The Bombay High Court heard together two writ petitions: Writ Petition No. 7740 of 2008 filed by Date Tanaji Honaji and Writ Petition No. 8696 of 2009...

29 30 31 32 33

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)