Search Results for "consumer protection"

755 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 755 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Permanent Pension Cut for Corruption in Co-operative Department — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe for Rejoining Duty Proved. Disciplinary Authority's Decision Based on Enquiry Report and TNPSC Opinion Not Interfered With Under Article 226.

The petitioner, S. Ponmani, while serving as Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies, was issued a charge memo on 05.05.2005 alleging that he d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Permanent Pension Cut for Corruption in Co-operative Department. Disciplinary Proceedings for Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Upheld as Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse.

The petitioner, S. Ponmani, while serving as Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies, was issued a charge memo on 05.05.2005 alleging that he d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Inconsistent Appellate Orders in Food Supplies Dispute — Orders Passed Without Review Jurisdiction Set Aside. Minister's Two Orders in Same Appeal Contradict Each Other, Leading to Quashing of Later Order and Remand to District Supply Officer.

The petitioners, Nikhil Banduji Mahajan and Savita wd/o Banduji Mahajan, filed a writ petition challenging two orders passed by the Minister of Food, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Cancelling Fair Price Shop License Without Hearing — Violation of Natural Justice Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955. License Cancellation Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Audi Alteram Partem Principle.

The petitioner, Dinesh Bansilal Agrawal, was a licensee of a fair price shop under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The Minister of Food, Civil Su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Minister's Order in Kerosene Licence Renewal Case Due to Discriminatory Treatment of Appellant. Order XX Rule 1 CPC Mandates Timely Pronouncement of Judgment by Quasi-Judicial Authorities; Two-Year Delay After Hearing Vitiates the Minister's Decision.

The dispute arose from the non-renewal of a retail kerosene licence held by the petitioner since 1987. Despite renewal until 1997 and continued distri...