Search Results for "collateral agreement"

432 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 432 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case Despite Vehicle Seizure Claim. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 NI Act Stands as Liability Not Extinguished by Seizure of Collateral.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Shobhnaben Jayendrakumar Panchal against the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Panchmahal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Jurisdictional Limits on State Interference in Land Rights: State of West Bengal v. Jai Hind Pvt. Ltd., Civil Appeal No. 7407 of 2012

The case arose from a dispute involving land/tenancy rights and administrative interference by State authorities in West Bengal. The High Court had se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Illegal Electricity Demand by Government of Goa. Demand of Rs. 48,50,360/- for Electricity Charges from Successor Company Set Aside as Without Authority of Law Under Electricity Act, 1910 and Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The appellants, Shri Ambey Forging Pvt. Ltd. and its director Pawan Lila, filed an appeal against the judgment and decree dated 31/03/2007 of the Ad h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Decree-Holder in Execution Proceedings, Setting Aside Dismissal as Time-Barred. The court held that filing chamber summons and other applications constituted steps in aid of execution, extending limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves an appeal by Pratap G. Somaiya (the appellant/decree-holder) against an order dismissing his execution application as time-barred. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to State Commission's Order Setting Aside Attachment in Consumer Dispute. Earlier writ petition challenging same order dismissed for non-prosecution; no fresh cause of action shown.

The petitioner, R.B. Upadhyay, filed a consumer complaint against Vodafone Essar Ltd. (respondent No.2) for deficiency of service on 20 March 2008, al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petitions for Non-Prosecution Due to Non-Compliance with Directions. Failure to File Affidavit of Documents and Appear Before Court Leads to Dismissal Under Rule 34 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.

The judgment concerns two company petitions (CP 496/2014 and CP 497/2014) filed by Janak Herkishen Vaswani and Mrs. Renuka Herkishen Vaswani respectiv...