Search Results for "block development officer"

1300 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1300 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Compensation Enhancement for Acquired Land. Court holds that belated acquisition proceedings and failure to pay compensation within five years render acquisition lapsed under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by the State of Karnataka and its authorities against the judgment of a learned Single Judge in land a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Writ Petition After Encroachments Removed from Cart Track. Block Development Officer confirmed removal of obstructions, rendering petition infructuous.

The petitioner, Chinnammal, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 (District Collector, Bloc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition and Writ Petitions in Land Acquisition Dispute — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court held that the acquisition proceedings under the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 were valid and the petitioner failed to establish contempt.

The case involves a contempt petition (CCC No. 655/2023) filed by Chamundeshwari Nagara Sarvodaya Sangha against Sri Dinesh Kumar, Commissioner of Mys...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Collector's Approval of New Group Leader in Panchayat Samiti Party — Order Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Removal Without Notice Held Invalid Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Sau. Sangeeta Shinde, was elected as Gatneta (Group Leader) of the Indian National Congress party in the Shrirampur Panchayat Samiti, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Sarpanch Challenging Disqualification for Encroachment Due to Lack of Notice. Prior notice of inspection is mandatory before disqualifying a member under Section 14(1)(J-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Rekha Dadajwar, was the Sarpanch of Dabhad Village Panchayat. She was removed from office under Section 14(1)(J-3) of the Maharashtra ...