Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

797 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 797 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award That Declared Termination of Master Asset Purchase Agreement by Repudiation. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Scope of Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

30 Jan 2023

The appeal arises from a dispute between V Hotels Ltd (appellant) and Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt Ltd (respondent no. 1) concerning a Master Asset Purc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11(6) Application and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Property Sale Dispute. Arbitration clauses in MOU and Agreement for Sale held prima facie valid, and dispute referred to arbitration despite respondent's objection regarding non-signing of agreement.

7 Aug 2023

The applicant, Bhupinder Singh Balwant Singh, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment in Execution of Arbitral Award — WIFPA Dispute Settlement Committee Award Held Enforceable as Arbitration Award Under Section 36 of Arbitration Act. The court held that the dispute settlement mechanism under Article 32(A) of WIFPA's Articles of Association constitutes a valid arbitration agreement and the award is enforceable as a decree.

1 Aug 2013

The case involves an appeal by Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dismissing its Chamber Summons in ex...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Prohibition Against Commercial Court in Arbitration Matter. Commercial Court's Jurisdiction Upheld Under Section 2(1)(c) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and Petitioner Estopped from Challenging Jurisdiction After Having Earlier Invoked It.

2 Jun 2023

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of prohibition to restrain the LXXXV Additional City Civil a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds — Section 34 Application Filed Beyond Limitation Period. Court holds that period of limitation for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 runs from the date of receipt of the original award and is not extended by a subsequent correction application under Section 33.

7 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Marwadi Shares & Finance Ltd, a member of the National Stock Exchange and Bombay Stock Exchange, had disputes with its constituent, re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application, Holds LLP Can Be Party to Arbitration Under LLP Agreement Despite Not Being Signatory. LLP Agreement is Charter Document Binding the LLP, and Disputes Relating to LLP's Affairs Necessarily Involve LLP as Party.

4 Mar 2025

The applicant, Kartik Radia, a former partner of BDO India LLP, was expelled from the LLP. He sought to initiate arbitration under the LLP Agreement d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Society Members Challenging Arbitral Award for Lack of Locus Standi. Non-signatories to arbitration agreement cannot challenge award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Dec 2014

The petitioners, who are members of Apsara Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Shareholders' Dispute Despite Pending NCLT Proceedings and Prior Arbitral Award. The Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the court should not refuse appointment unless the dispute is ex facie non-arbitrable, and issues of arbitrability should be left to the arbitrator.

4 Nov 2022

The appeal arose from the dismissal of an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Madras High Court. The ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Referring Dispute to Arbitration in Commercial Suit — Arbitration Agreement Not Duly Signed by Plaintiff. Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires existence of valid arbitration agreement; mere reference in invoices insufficient.

8 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Tusker Workspace Pvt. Ltd., filed a commercial suit (Com. O.S. No.207/2024) before the LXXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Arbitral Award Set Aside by Commercial Court. Court Restores Arbitral Award Holding That the Commercial Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Reappreciating Evidence.

29 Aug 2024

The case involves a commercial dispute between Navayuga Engineering Company (appellant) and Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited along with other ...

29 30 31 32 33

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)