Search Results for "arbitration challenge"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitration challenge"

1870 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1870 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute — Clause 25 Arbitration Invoked. The court appointed a former Judge of this Court as the sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate disputes between the parties under the Joint Development Agreement dated 30.03.2009.

27 Aug 2018

The petitioner, M/s Township Promoters, a registered partnership firm, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Cross-Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matter — Power of Appellate Court Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Examined. The Court held that an appellate court under Section 37 cannot remand a Section 34 petition for fresh hearing but must decide the appeal on merits.

8 Jul 2024

The dispute arose from a development agreement concerning a slum rehabilitation scheme in Mumbai. The appellant, Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Partial Award on Existence of JEA. The petition challenges an arbitral tribunal's finding that an initialled but unsigned JEA was a valid contract containing an arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration Act.

3 Nov 2025

The petition arose out of a partial arbitral award dated January 9, 2014, passed under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in MoU Dispute Over Flat Area — Petitioner's Obligation to Sell 1 Lac Sq. Ft. Upheld. Arbitrator's Plausible Interpretation of Contract Not Interfered With Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Jan 2019

The Bombay High Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by The Bombay Dyeing And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. challenging an arbitral award passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitral Award Challenge — No Automatic Stay Under Section 36 of Arbitration Act Without Strong Prima Facie Case. Court holds that mere filing of Section 34 petition does not warrant stay; applicant must demonstrate irreparable harm and balance of convenience.

14 Dec 2020

The judgment concerns an interim application filed by Kishor N Shah and others (the Shahs) under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Procedural Order in Arbitration Proceeding. Section 9 or Section 19 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Cannot Be Invoked to Challenge Arbitrator's Communication Regarding Procedure.

28 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Sahyadri Earthmovers, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 read with Section 19 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Charter Party Demurrage Dispute — Upholds Arbitrator's Interpretation of Laytime and Demurrage Clauses. Court holds that Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not permit reappreciation of evidence or correction of errors of law unless award is patently illegal or perverse.

15 Jul 2011

The petitioners, M/s. Puyvast Chartering B.V. (owner) and M/s. Puyvast Maritime India Ltd. (agent), challenged an arbitral award dated 28 February 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds — Section 34 Application Filed Beyond Limitation Period. Court holds that period of limitation for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 runs from the date of receipt of the original award and is not extended by a subsequent correction application under Section 33.

7 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Marwadi Shares & Finance Ltd, a member of the National Stock Exchange and Bombay Stock Exchange, had disputes with its constituent, re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Section 9 Interim Relief in Foreign Award Enforcement. Court Confirms Injunction Restraining Alienation of Helicopter Pending Enforcement of Singapore Award Under Part II of Arbitration Act, 1996.

29 Jun 2018

The respondent, Aircon Feibars FZE, obtained a foreign award in Singapore on 25 January 2017 for approximately US$7 million (Rs.46 Crores) against the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Jurisdiction Dispute, Reversing High Court's Return of Petition. Designated Seat of Arbitration at Srinagar Determines Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of Jammu & Kashmir Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1997, Irrespective of Venue at New Delhi Where Proceedings Were Conducted and Award Rendered.

15 Apr 2026

The appeal arose from a High Court order that returned a petition filed under Section 34 of the Jammu & Kashmir Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

29 30 31 32 33

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)