Search Results for "Vendor Not Party"

716 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 716 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Agreement to Sell Dated 09.01.2012 Proved, Readiness and Willingness Established, and Limitation Issue Rejected.

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) was filed by the defendants (appellants) against the ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal: Stranger to Compromise Decree Can Challenge It by Separate Suit — Order 23 Rule 3A CPC Does Not Bar Such Suit

The appeal arose from a suit filed by the appellant, Triloki Nath Singh, seeking a declaration that a compromise decree dated 15 September 1994 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Revision in Eviction Suit Based on Bona Fide Requirement — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Subsequent Induction of New Tenant in Adjacent Shop Not Relevant as It Was Not Part of Suit Property.

The case involves a suit for eviction filed by the owners (plaintiffs) against the tenants (defendants) in respect of two shops, on the ground of bona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand Against Successors in Interest Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Predecessor in title not given opportunity of hearing before determination of deficit stamp duty under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

The petitioners, who are the legal heirs and successors in interest of one Abubakar Memon, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA Housing Allotment — Petitioner's Challenge to Eligibility of Allottees Fails. Court holds that MHADA's decision to allot flats to respondents was within its administrative discretion and not arbitrary under Article 226.

The petitioner, Ved Prakash Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging the a...