Search Results for "Sentence Modification"

309 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 309 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antecedents. Appellant's sentence reduced to period already undergone for producing forged land document to secure bail under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC.

The appellant, was convicted by the Fifth Additional Sessions Judge, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh on 06.01.2024 for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act but Modifies Sentence to Fine in View of Full Deposit of Cheque Amount. Offence under Section 138 NI Act is quasi-criminal and compoundable; once entire cheque amount is deposited, sentence of imprisonment can be substituted with fine.

The applicant-accused was convicted by the learned 9th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vadodara in Criminal Case No.15001 of 2017 for the offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Modifies Sentence in Section 138 NI Act Case to Period Already Undergone After Full Compensation Deposit. Conviction for Cheque Dishonour Upheld but Imprisonment Reduced as Accused Deposited Double the Cheque Amount Under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The applicant, Bhupendrabhai Hirjibhai Patel, was convicted by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gondal in Criminal Case No.1329 of 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partly Allows Revision in NI Act Case, Modifies Sentence to Fine After Full Deposit of Cheque Amount. The Court held that once the cheque amount is deposited, the sentence of imprisonment can be substituted with fine under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The applicant, Ushaben Jaykumar Bhaitya, was convicted by the JMFC, Dahod in Criminal Case No.1625 of 2014 for the offence under Section 138 of the Ne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Death but Modifies Sentence to Compensation in 11-Year-Old Case. Appellant's sentence of three months simple imprisonment set aside; Rs. 1,00,000 deposited as compensation to victim's mother under Section 357(3) CrPC.

The appellant, Muthupandi, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai for offences under Sections 279 and 304(A) of the Indian Penal Code (I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Revision, Maintains Conviction but Modifies Sentence to Period Already Undergone in Bombay Prohibition Act Case. Sentence modified due to applicant's advanced age (82 years) and period already undergone (about one month).

The applicant, Gendlal s/o Surjumal Jaiswal, aged about 78 years at the time of filing, was convicted by the trial court and appellate court for offen...