Gujarat High Court Modifies Sentence in Section 138 NI Act Case to Period Already Undergone After Full Compensation Deposit. Conviction for Cheque Dishonour Upheld but Imprisonment Reduced as Accused Deposited Double the Cheque Amount Under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Bhupendrabhai Hirjibhai Patel, was convicted by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gondal in Criminal Case No.1329 of 2011 for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) and sentenced to simple imprisonment for one year and to pay compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- (double the cheque amount of Rs.1,00,000/-), with default simple imprisonment of four months. The conviction was upheld by the learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Gondal in Criminal Appeal No.19 of 2019 vide order dated 19.09.2020. The applicant then filed the present revision application under Sections 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. During the revision proceedings, the applicant's counsel submitted that the applicant had already deposited the entire compensation amount of Rs.2,00,000/- before the trial court in installments: Rs.60,000/- on 14.10.2020, Rs.40,000/- before filing the appeal, and Rs.1,00,000/- on 07.11.2020. The court noted that the offence under Section 138 NI Act is quasi-criminal and compoundable, and since the entire amount had been deposited, the offence stood compounded. The court held that the sentence of imprisonment could be reduced to the period already undergone. Accordingly, the court dismissed the revision application challenging conviction but modified the sentence to the period already undergone, while confirming the compensation order. The court directed that if the compensation amount had not been disbursed to the complainant, it should be disbursed after due verification.

Headnote

A) Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Section 138 - Compounding - The accused deposited the entire cheque amount of Rs.1,00,000/- and additional compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- before the trial court, totaling Rs.2,00,000/-. The court held that since the amount has been deposited, the offence is compounded and the sentence can be modified to the period already undergone. (Paras 1-3)

B) Criminal Procedure Code - Revision - Section 397 read with 401 - The High Court in revision can modify the sentence in view of subsequent events like deposit of compensation. The court reduced the sentence of one year simple imprisonment to the period already undergone (about 5 years and 11 months) as the accused had already deposited the compensation amount. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 should be upheld or modified in light of the deposit of the cheque amount by the accused.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The revision application is dismissed. The conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is confirmed. However, the sentence of simple imprisonment for one year is modified to the period already undergone. The order of compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- is confirmed. If the compensation amount has not been disbursed to the complainant, the trial court shall disburse the same after due verification.

Law Points

  • Compounding of offence under Section 138 NI Act is permissible even at revision stage
  • deposit of cheque amount amounts to compounding
  • sentence can be reduced to period already undergone if compensation is paid
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 1147

R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION - NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT) NO. 556 of 2020

2026-03-24

Hasmukh D. Suthar

2026:GUJHC:21539

Jaimin R Patel, Mokshay R Vyas, Rohan Raval

Bhupendrabhai Hirjibhai Patel

State of Gujarat & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal revision application against conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Remedy Sought

Quashing and setting aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 29.04.2019 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gondal in Criminal Case No.1329 of 2011, and the appellate order dated 19.09.2020 passed by the learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Gondal in Criminal Appeal No.19 of 2019.

Filing Reason

The applicant was convicted for dishonour of cheque under Section 138 NI Act and sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and compensation of Rs.2,00,000/-. The appeal against conviction was dismissed. The applicant filed revision challenging the conviction and sentence.

Previous Decisions

The trial court convicted the applicant on 29.04.2019. The appellate court dismissed the appeal on 19.09.2020.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 138 NI Act is sustainable? Whether the sentence can be modified in view of the deposit of the entire compensation amount?

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant's counsel submitted that the applicant has already deposited Rs.2,00,000/- before the trial court in installments: Rs.60,000/- on 14.10.2020, Rs.40,000/- before filing appeal, and Rs.1,00,000/- on 07.11.2020. Since the amount is deposited, the offence is compoundable and the sentence may be reduced to the period already undergone.

Ratio Decidendi

Since the offence under Section 138 NI Act is compoundable and the accused has deposited the entire cheque amount and compensation, the sentence can be reduced to the period already undergone, while the conviction stands.

Judgment Excerpts

By way of present revision application under Sections 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed for quashing and setting aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 29.04.2019... Learned Advocate for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has already deposited Rs.2,00,000/- before the learned trial Court... In view of above once the amount being deposited and as the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act is quasi-criminal in character and is compoundable...

Procedural History

The trial court convicted the applicant on 29.04.2019 in Criminal Case No.1329 of 2011. The applicant appealed to the Sessions Court, which dismissed the appeal on 19.09.2020 in Criminal Appeal No.19 of 2019. The applicant then filed the present revision application in the High Court on an unspecified date. During the revision, the applicant deposited the compensation amount. The High Court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 24.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 397, 401
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Bus Driver Upheld. Compensation of Rs. 18,91,600 with 7.5% Interest Affirmed Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Death of Motorcyclist.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Order Restoring Posting of Joint Director-Boilers, Expunges Adverse Remarks Against Director. Transfer order set aside for non-application of mind and violation of transfer policy; adverse observations against Dir...