Search Results for "Section 133 Indian Contract Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Section 133 Indian Contract Act"

395 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 395 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Deletion of Names from Co-operative Society's Voter List. Petitioners Argue That Partnership Firm Default Does Not Disqualify Individual Members Under Section 27 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

28 Nov 2022

The case comprised two writ petitions filed by three individuals who were members of Yogeshwar Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Dhule. They challenge...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape and Robbery in Case of False Promise of Marriage. Court holds that sexual intercourse on false promise of marriage constitutes rape under Section 375 IPC and that theft during such act amounts to robbery under Section 390 IPC.

10 Jun 2022

The case involves two appeals: Criminal Appeal No. 467 of 2012 filed by the convict Anand Singh challenging his conviction and sentence, and Criminal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Competent Authority's Order Under MOFA — Failure to Obtain Prior Consent of Landowners Renders Development Agreement Void. The court held that the Competent Authority under Section 9A of MOFA has jurisdiction to decide disputes regarding prior consent, and the petitioners' failure to obtain such consent made the agreements void.

21 Jun 2011

The petitioners, Arenja Industries Limited and Akshar Construction, filed three writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Competent Authority un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition to Quash Compromise Decree in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Held That Compromise Decree Was Not Validly Passed as It Was Based on a Consent Term That Was Contrary to Law and Without Jurisdiction.

5 Jun 2023

The case involves a dispute over property ownership. The original petitioner, Narhar Rango Kulkarni (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), file...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Policy Circulars in SEIS Benefits Case — Circulars Imposing Additional Conditions for Service Providers Held Ultra Vires. Shipping Agent Entitled to SEIS Benefits as Service Provider Under Foreign Trade Policy.

9 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Atlantic Shipping Private Limited, a shipping agent providing port services and logistical support to foreign clients, challenged the ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Prima Facie Upholds Plaintiff’s Patent and Finds Infringement by Defendant in Transformer Explosion Prevention Technology Case; Interim Injunction Issued. Court Rejects Defendant’s Arguments on Invalidity and Defences, Holding That a Strong Prima Facie Case Exists Under the Patents Act, 1970.

23 Oct 2015

The dispute involved a claim of patent infringement concerning a system and method for preventing and detecting explosion and fire in electrical trans...

High Court

FIRST APPEAL NO.316 OF 2015

21 Nov 2015

The litigation arose from a civil suit (RCS No.3/2004) filed by Kopargaon Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited against 7 Star Distilleries and Royal Drink...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Regional Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Office Bearers of Unrecognized Union as Protected Workmen Under Section 33(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Only Office Bearers of Recognized Union (Federation) Are Entitled to Protected Workmen Status; Deemed Recognition on Expiry of 15 Days Not Contemplated Under Rule 61(4) of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

12 Nov 2024

The Petitioner, Tata Communications Limited, challenged an order dated 14 August 2024 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Pune, decl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Guarantor Company Due to Bona Fide Dispute and Pendency of DRT Proceedings. Court Finds That Existence of Disputes Regarding Validity of Guarantee and Pending Recovery Proceedings Before DRT Render the Petition Not Maintainable Under Companies Act, 1956.

23 Jun 2016

The petitioner, SICOM Ltd., a financial institution, filed a winding-up petition against the respondent, Entertainment World Developers Pvt. Ltd., und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Electricity Theft Assessment Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Procedural Violation Found as No Prior Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Was Given Before Provisional Assessment. The court held that the requirement of 'reasonable opportunity of being heard' under Section 126(1) is mandatory and cannot be dispensed with, quashing the assessment order and directing fresh proceedings.

22 Feb 2024

The petitioners, City Center Mall Private Limited and Shrirang Sarda, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the ...

29 30 31 32 33

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)