Search Results for "Sarla Verma Case"

869 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 869 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 2,87,000 to Rs. 6,00,000. Deceased's Income Reassessed at Rs. 4,500 per Month with Future Prospects and Multiplier of 18 Applied.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, legal heirs of deceased Ashokkumar Jivanbhai Chaudhri, who died in a motor vehicle accident on 24.11.1998. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Despite Driver's Invalid License. Pay and Recover Principle Applied as Insurer Must Compensate Third Party and Recover from Owner.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the respondent no.1 (original applicant) before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Pune. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Claimants Failed to Prove That the Offending Vehicle Was Involved in the Accident, and Non-Examination of Eyewitness Led to Adverse Inference.

The appellants, original claimants, filed an appeal against the judgment dated 07.05.2004 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalgaon, which dismis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Pillion Rider Covered Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Held that the expression 'any person' in Section 163-A includes a pillion rider and that the petition is maintainable even in a hit-and-run case.

The appellant, Lalita wd/o Rajkumar Sawalkar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which was later converted to a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Upholds Compensation for Deceased Motorcyclist. No Contributory Negligence Found as Maruti Car Driver Was Solely Negligent, and Compensation Based on Income Tax Returns and Multiplier of 10 Was Proper.

The case arises from a motor accident on 7th August 1994, when Rajendra, the deceased, was riding a Hero Honda motorcycle and was hit by a Maruti car ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of 55-Year-Old in Motor Vehicle Accident, Upholds Negligence Finding Against Driver. Multiplier applied as per Sarla Verma, future prospects at 10%, and conventional heads enhanced under Pranay Sethi.

This judgment arises from two cross-appeals under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 23.03.2021 in M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Permanent Disability in Motor Accident Case — Tribunal's Award of Rs.1,10,410/- Found Inadequate. Appellant, a housewife with 30% permanent disability, awarded enhanced compensation of Rs.2,50,000/- with interest under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sau. Arati Bhimrao Shinde, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Death of 45-Year-Old Businessman. Tribunal's deduction of 30% towards income tax held erroneous; multiplier of 14 applied on notional income of Rs. 6,000 per month with 50% future prospects.

The appeal arises from a judgment dated 7-7-2015 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and Additional MACT at Basavakalyan in MVC No.154/2014. The appellan...