Search Results for "Representative appointment"

806 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 806 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in NI Act Case Due to Company Having Been Dissolved Prior to Issuance of Cheque. Director Not Held Liable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Company Struck Off Under Companies Act, 1956.

Background: The petitioner, a director of Giga Networks Private Limited, approached the High Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Appoints Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Between Power Solutions Company and Electricity Supply Company. Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 allowed due to failure of respondent to appoint arbitrator as per clause 4.1 of contract agreement dated 28.03.2018.

The petitioner, M/s Nsure Reliable Power Solutions Pvt Ltd, a private limited company engaged in infrastructure business, participated in a tender flo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010102062008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010085932008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Government Order Handing Over Mahabaleshwara Temple to Ramachandrapura Mutt. The Court Examines Validity of Revenue Department's Order Under Bombay Public Trust Act and Constitutional Provisions.

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions and writ appeals filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, including Writ Petition No.30609...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Forfeiture of Earnest Money in Toll Collection Tender Dispute. Variation in Contract Period from 90 Weeks to 52 Weeks Constitutes Counter-Offer, Not Acceptance, Thus Forfeiture Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s Abhay Construction, a partnership firm, submitted a tender to the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. for collecti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in Iron Ore Sale Dispute. The court held that the Section 9 application was within limitation and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, M/s Shree Mallikarjun Shipping Pvt. Ltd., entered into a contract dated 25.2.2008 with the respondent, M/s Balaji Logistics Carriers, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Appointment of Court Receiver and Interim Compensation in Property Dispute. Court holds that mere filing of affidavits does not establish grave urgency warranting appointment of receiver or direction for deposit of interim compensation at an interim stage.

The appellant, Ramesh Sippy, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking possession of Flat No.5/B in Shree Vijayaa Bhavan, Mumbai, claiming ownersh...