Search Results for "Reply Statement"

6838 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6838 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Industrial Court's Order Granting Permanency to Contract Labourers. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Contractor Deployment Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s Uni Klinger Ltd., challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar dated 28.08.2003, which allowed complaints filed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, Considers Election Petition Alleging Improper Rejection of Nomination Under Section 9A of Representation of the People Act, 1951. Petitioner Claims Retirement from Partnership Firm Removed Disqualification Before Scrutiny Date.

The petitioner, a former partner in M/s. Musale Construction, intended to contest the 2014 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election from 49-Saoner co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against YouTuber for Disparaging Marico's Products in Video Review. Court holds that false and malicious statements in product reviews can constitute disparagement, and interim injunction can be granted even if defendant is not a competitor.

The plaintiff, Marico Limited, a company manufacturing and selling various consumer products including hair oils and foods, filed a suit against the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant Company's Revision Against Jurisdiction Under PSCC Act. Company Failed to Prove Paid-Up Share Capital Below Rs.1 Crore to Avail Protection Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The dispute arose from a suit for possession filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents 1 to 12) against M/s. New Era Fabrics Ltd., the original de...