Search Results for "Recall order"

1627 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1627 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Lok Adalat Compromise Decree in Partition Suit: Third Party Not Permitted to Invoke Article 226 Against Lok Adalat Award. Writ Remedy Not Available to Strangers to Decree; Proper Recourse Is to File a Separate Suit for Declaration and Partition.

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by five individuals claiming to be members of the same family as t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SECOND APPEAL NO.538 2005

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Government's Withdrawal from Acquisition Set Aside Due to Possession and Award. Possession Taken and Award Passed Preclude Withdrawal Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had set aside the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CESTAT Order Rejecting Recall of Fraud Finding in CENVAT Credit Case. Court holds that CESTAT's finding of mis-statement and fraud was not a reviewable error and that the Tribunal had inherent power to impose costs for abuse of process.

The petitioner, Essel Propack Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing plastic tubes, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Disposes Writ Petition Under Article 227 of Constitution of India, Directs Trial Court to Reconsider Compromise Decree in Ancestral Property Dispute Involving Fraud Allegations

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India to quash a compromise decree in OS No. 123/2025, alleging it was frau...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner to File Written Statement Beyond 90 Days in Partition Suit. Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory, Not Mandatory — Trial Court's Rejection Quashed on Payment of Costs.

The petitioner, Sri S. Indushekhar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 25/11/202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Look Out Circulars Issued by Banks for Loan Recovery — Right to Travel Upheld. Banks Directed to Recall LoCs as Issuance Solely for Civil Debt Recovery Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Dr. Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty, an Indian citizen aged 78 years, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...