Search Results for "Naresh Kumar case"

465 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 465 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Maharashtra Stamp Act Amendment on Advertisements. Petition Seeks Declaration that Imposition of Stamp Duty on Mass Media Advertising Contracts is Unconstitutional and Void.

The Advertising Agencies Association of India and several other entities representing advertising, newspaper publishing, and broadcasting sectors file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal in Industrial Dispute — Scope of Enquiry Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Clarified. Labour Court's Order Rejecting Approval for Dismissal Restored as It Did Not Exceed Its Limited Jurisdiction.

The appeal arose from a dispute between John D'Souza, a workman, and the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). The workman joined as a b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal of Minor Injured in Motor Accident — Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 17,52,000/- to Rs. 23,88,000/-. Notional income of minor assessed at Rs. 15,000/- per month with 40% future prospects and 67.53% permanent partial disability.

The case involves an appeal by the original claimant, a minor injured in a motor accident, against the judgment and award dated 15.03.2022 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Pronounces Order on Writ Petition No. 26754 of 2025 Challenging PMLA Arrest and ECIR Jurisdiction. The court examined the legality of arrest under Section 19 of Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 based on ECIR registered in Gangtok, Sikkim.

The writ petition was filed by the wife of K.C. Veerendra, who was arrested on 23.08.2025 pursuant to ECIR/BGZO/19/2025 under the Prevention of Money-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Review Award in Land Acquisition Case — Review of Award Not Permitted Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Section 13A Only Allows Correction of Clerical or Arithmetical Mistakes Within Six Months, Not Substantive Review.

The case pertains to land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appellants' land was acquired by a notification dated 23.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Consent Terms in Eviction Suit Due to Breach of Undertaking and Delay. Applicants who gave a solemn undertaking to vacate premises by 31st December 2016 and violated it cannot be permitted to resile from consent terms after 12 years.

The case arises from a long-standing eviction dispute. The respondent-plaintiff (licensor) instituted S.C. Suit No. 869 of 1975 against the applicants...