Search Results for "Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Act"

842 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 842 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows SIPCOT's Appeal in Sub-Leasing Dispute — Demand for Sub-Leasing Charges Upheld. Lease Agreement Clause 2(vii) Prohibiting Sub-Leasing Without Consent and Requiring Payment of Charges is Valid and Enforceable.

The case involves two writ appeals filed by State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited (SIPCOT) against orders of a learned Single J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows MIDC Appeal and Dismisses Claimant's Cross Objection in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. Reference Court's enhancement of compensation from Rs.26,500 to Rs.1,25,000 per hectare upheld as based on evidence, but further enhancement claimed by claimant rejected.

The case pertains to acquisition of land admeasuring 2.75 HR from Survey No. 185 at Mouza Tadali, Chandrapur, for industrial purpose by the Maharashtr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery Notices for Excess Wages Paid to Employees. Recovery of wages paid under mistake of law held impermissible without prior notice and opportunity of hearing.

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 30/09/2005 passed by the Industrial Court, L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Sales Tax Incentive Scheme. Retrospective Operation of Section 41B of Bombay Sales Tax Act and Rule 31AA Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Vested Rights.

The petitioners, M/s. Prasad Power Control Pvt. Limited and its director, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 41B of the Bombay Sales Ta...