Search Results for "Intervention"

423 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 423 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Violate Separate Cadre Identity Under Rule 5.

The dispute arose from a batch of civil appeals filed by Inspectors of the Central Excise and Land Customs or Goods and Services Tax Administration, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Land Revenue Dispute Due to Absence of Error Apparent on Record. Review Jurisdiction Limited to Patent Errors as Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Any Apparent Error in Earlier Dismissal of Special Leave Petition.

The Supreme Court was dealing with a review petition seeking reconsideration of its earlier dismissal of a special leave petition. The litigation orig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Directing Confirmation of Auction Sale Under Punjab Package Deal Properties (Disposal) Act, 1976. High Court's Intervention Justified as Financial Commissioner's Order Based on Conjectures Without Material Evidence Under Rule 8 of the Rules 1976.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dated 13 August 2008, which set aside an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...