High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Company Appeal (L) No. 47 of 2012 Along with Connected Appeals and Applications. No substantive judgment text was provided; only the cause list and appearances were available.
6 Nov 2012...
Search Results for "International commercial arbitration"
659 result(s) found
Found 659 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute Case — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal of Interim Injunction. Court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for restraining the pledge of shares, as the shares were not proved to be held in a fiduciary capacity.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a dispute between two branches of the Arya family over shares of Arya Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. The appellants, Ravi Arya and other...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Refusing Interim Relief in Share Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against EGM and Share Transfer. Court held that balance of convenience did not favour restraining the holding company from exercising its voting rights and that the appellants failed to establish a strong prima facie case for the relief sought.
13 Feb 2019The case involves a dispute between the appellants (Ravi Arya, Nakul Arya, Sushma Arya, Varun Arya, and Ravi Arya HUF) and the respondents, including ...
- 130
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Cross-Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matter — Power of Appellate Court Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Examined. The Court held that an appellate court under Section 37 cannot remand a Section 34 petition for fresh hearing but must decide the appeal on merits.
8 Jul 2024The dispute arose from a development agreement concerning a slum rehabilitation scheme in Mumbai. The appellant, Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation...
- 424
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Challenging Tender and Work Orders in Cooperative Milk Marketing. Petitions Filed by Warehousing Agent and Co-Packer Against Karnataka Cooperative Milk Federation and Its Unions Alleging Breach of Exclusive Contracts for Telangana Operations.
1 Jun 2026Background: The case involved two writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging certain actions of the Karnataka Co-operative Mi...
- 121
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Challenge to Division Bench Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Dispute — Key Reasons Involve Interpretation of Contractual Notice Conditions and Waiver by Estoppel. Specific Legal Finding That Drove The Verdict: The Court's analysis focused on whether the Division Bench erred in interfering under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with the Arbitral Tribunal's interpretation of contract provisions regarding notice requirements and whether such interference was justified on grounds of patent illegality or violation of Section 28(3).
1 Jan 1970The litigation arose from an EPC contract dispute between SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation (contractor) and GMR Kamalanga Energy Ltd. (ow...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reviews Delhi High Court's Rejection of Referral to Arbitration in International Commodity Contract. Unsigned Contract No. 061-16-12115-S, accepted through supply, invoices, and standby letters of credit, contains Arbitration Clause 32.2 providing for LCIA arbitration in London under Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 Jan 1970The dispute concerned the existence of a binding arbitration agreement between a Swiss commodity trader and an Indian proprietorship concern producing...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Stay on Money Decree in Trademark Infringement Suit Without Deposit; Dismisses SLP. The Court Found No Reason to Interfere with Unconditional Stay Granted Under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC Pending Appeal.
24 Sep 2025The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by Lifestyle Equities C.V., an Amsterdam-based company and proprietor of the Beverly Hills Polo Club (BHPC) ...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Extension of Arbitral Mandate Under Section 29-A(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Demise of Arbitrator and Insolvency of Party Held Sufficient Cause for Extension Despite Lack of Consent Under Section 29-A(3).
6 Feb 2025The petitioners, Scape Marketing Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Foreign Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act — Foreign Award Not Challengeable Under Domestic Provisions. The court held that a foreign award cannot be challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and mere denial of the agreement does not convert it into a domestic award.
28 Feb 2005The appeal arose from an order of a single judge dismissing the appellant's petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, c...
- 119
