Search Results for "Delay Condone"

1009 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1009 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case Due to Court Closure During Limitation Period — Condonation of Delay Granted. The period of court closure during winter vacation is excluded for computing limitation under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, aggrieved by an arbitral award dated 24.08.2016, sought to challenge it under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Reference Application in Customs Duty Evasion Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Application filed under Section 130 of Customs Act, 1962 for reference of questions of law from CEGAT order held time-barred as delay of 240 days not explained.

The Commissioner of Customs (Import) filed an application under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 seeking a reference to the High Court of certain ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case as Complaint Was Time-Barred Under Section 142(b) of NI Act. Failure to File Condonation Application for Limitation Despite Objection at Trial Renders Acquittal Proper.

The appeal before the Karnataka High Court arose out of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, alleging dishonour of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's SLP as Time-Barred Due to 663-Day Delay, Imposes Costs for Wasting Judicial Time. Government Inefficiency Not a Valid Ground for Condonation of Delay Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh as time-barred due to an inordinate delay of 663 days. The C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Railway Accident Claim — Illiteracy and Poverty Constitute Sufficient Cause Under Section 17(2) of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. The Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal and remanded the matter for fresh consideration on merits.

The appellant, Saraswati Giri, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, following the death of her son in a tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Condonation of Delay in Section 140 Motor Accident Claim — No Limitation Prescribed for No-Fault Compensation. Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Application for Condonation of Delay as Section 140 Does Not Prescribe Any Limitation Period.

The petitioner, Ramesh Bhimrao Patil, was injured in a motor accident that occurred on 24 November 1989. He filed an application under Section 166 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging LARR Authority Orders Allowing Condonation of Delay and Amendment in Land Acquisition Reference. Procedural Flexibility Upheld Under Section 64 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 to Ensure Substantive Justice.

The petitioner, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited, owned approximately 10 acres of land in Village Vikhroli, Mumbai, which was acquired by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Section 249(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961, is Directory, Not Mandatory. Non-Payment of Self-Assessment Tax at Time of Filing Appeal Does Not Bar Appeal if Tax Paid Before Hearing.

The case involves an appeal by Shri Bharatkumar Sakhsaria against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 31-10-2001, which held his appe...