Search Results for "Customs tariff"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Customs tariff"

312 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 312 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Appellant Entitled to Cenvat Credit on Input Services. Definition of 'Input Service' Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is Broad and Includes Services Having Nexus with Manufacturing Business.

21 Apr 2021

The appellant, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited, is a manufacturer of motor vehicles and parts, registered under the Central Excise Act. It file...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Telecom Tower Installation in Residential Area Under Section 419 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Municipal Corporation Cannot Refuse Permission Based on Unauthorized Policy Restricting Towers in Residential Zones. Held that the power to grant permission under Section 419 is quasi-judicial and must be exercised reasonably, and a blanket ban on telecom towers in residential areas is ultra vires the Act.

26 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Bharti Airtel Limited, a telecom service provider, sought permission from the Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation to install a teleco...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cenvat Credit Appeals in Central Excise Case — Extended Limitation Period Not Invokable Without Suppression of Facts. Credit Denial Unsustainable When Simultaneously Available to Other Factories Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.

24 Jan 2018

The case involves four appeals filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by M/s. Sanvijay Rolling & Engineering Ltd. and Sanjay P. Agarw...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal on Excise Duty Exemption for Cotton Fabrics Produced by Cooperative Society. Interpretation of Exemption Notifications under Rule 8 of Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 at Issue.

27 Sep 1968

The appellant, a textile dealer in Bombay, entered into an agreement with a registered cooperative society for weaving cotton fabrics on powerlooms ow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Condition No. 5 of NOCs for Redevelopment Projects — Condition Imposing Payment of Expenditure Incurred by Board Held Unauthorized and Without Legal Basis. Court directs refund of amounts paid under protest pursuant to the impugned condition.

23 Nov 2022

The Petitioner, Chandulal Jorawarmal Mehta, a sole proprietor of Mehta Developers, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Arrest of Vessel in Admiralty Suit for Bunker Supply Debt. Bunker Suppliers Have Maritime Lien Under Indian Law and Admiralty Court Has Jurisdiction to Arrest Vessel for Necessaries Supplied.

8 Jul 2014

The plaintiff, Rushab Ship International LLC, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel M.V. African Eagle and others for recovery of USD 1,00,000 be...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification Disputes — Laminated Tubes and Printed Cartons Classified as Printed Matter Under Chapter 49. The court held that no substantial question of law arose as the classification was a question of fact determined by the Tribunal based on evidence.

30 Nov -0001

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa, filed multiple appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the common order of the Cus...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals by Authority for Advance Rulings Against High Court Judgment Quashing AAR's Rejection of Treaty Benefits. Questions Raised on Taxation of Capital Gains Under India-Mauritius DTAA and Scope of Section 245R(2) Proviso (iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

The disputes arose from applications for advance ruling filed by three Mauritius-incorporated companies—Tiger Global International II Holdings, Tige...

29 30 31 32

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)