Search Results for "Cooperative Court jurisdiction"

2255 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2255 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Contempt Proceedings Against Administrative Board Members for Disposing of Cooperative Society Property in Violation of Court Order. Perjury Notices Issued Under Section 192 IPC and Section 340 CrPC for Wilful Disposal of Property.

The case involved two writ petitions arising from the management of Gangakhed Taluka Sahakari Kharedi Vikri Sangh Ltd., a cooperative society. The pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Cooperative Society Dispute — Mandates Return of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC. Civil Court Lacked Jurisdiction Over Cooperative Dispute; Plaint Must Be Returned for Presentation to Proper Court Despite Delay.

The appellant, Gangabisan Mayaramji Paliwal, filed Second Appeal No.447/1998 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, against the judgment and decr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Whether Aurangabad Court Had Territorial Jurisdiction Under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act for Property in Hingoli. District Court Held It Lacked Jurisdiction; Appeal Outcome Not Provided.

The dispute arose out of a partnership firm, M/s Kasliwal Empire, formed by the appellant and respondent on 7.3.2007 for developing housing projects. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Certificate Against Guarantor in Cooperative Bank Loan Fraud Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Documents and Pass Reasoned Order Renders Recovery Proceedings Invalid Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Tarulata Amritlal Bava, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Recovery Certificate dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Decree Holder's Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Transfer of Attached Property Void Under Section 64 CPC. Sale of Property by Judgment Debtor After Attachment Order Cannot Defeat Decree Holder's Right to Execute Decree.

The case arises from a First Appeal filed by Mrs. Meera Unnikrishnan, the decree holder, against the dismissal of her execution application by the Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Telecom Tower Installations on Cooperative Society Rooftops. Held that telecom towers are not structures requiring consent under Section 79A of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and MCGM circular requiring consent is ultra vires.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by residents and cooperative housing societies challenging the installation of telecom towers on the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards of Reinstatement Without Back Wages. Held that daily wage employees who worked for less than 240 days in a year are not entitled to reinstatement under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the employer, Dainik Bhaskar Group (D. B. Corp Ltd), challenging the awards of the Labour Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Service Protection Claims in Caste Invalidation Cases After Supreme Court Overrules Full Bench Decision. Supreme Court in FCI v. Jagdish Balaram Bahira Overrules Arun Sonone, Potentially Denying Protection to Petitioners Whose Scheduled Tribe Certificates Were Invalidated.

The judgment arose from a batch of writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, wherein petitioners sought protection in service a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Deliberates on Employment Status of Contract Workers in Statutory Canteens Under Factories Act. The Court Examines Whether Workers Engaged by Contractor to Run Canteen Required Under Section 46 Are Deemed Employees of Principal Employer.

The appeals arose from a dispute over the employment status of casual workers employed by a contractor to run a canteen at Air India's premises. The c...