Search Results for "Common Purpose"

8398 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8398 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Arrest of Foreign Vessel in Admiralty Suit — Plaintiffs' Claim for Supply of Bunkers and Stores Falls Within Admiralty Jurisdiction Under Section 4(1) of the Admiralty Act, 2017.

The plaintiffs, Universal Marine and Ramanand Padiyar, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel M.T. Hartati (a Singapore-flagged vessel) and its ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010224592017_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction in Arson and Murder Case. Accused Challenged Conviction Under Sections 302, 436, 342, 143, 147, 148, 149, 120B IPC; State Filed Appeal Seeking Enhancement of Sentence.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay adjudicated eight criminal appeals filed against the judgment dated 9 May 2005 by the 4th Additional Sessions J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Matters to Final Hearing on Whether Pre-execution Challenge to COFEPOSA Detention Orders Can Be on Grounds Beyond Alka Subhash Gadia Exceptions. The Court Examined if New Grounds Such as Absence of Live Link and Delay Could Be Used to Challenge Detention Orders Before Execution.

The Supreme Court dealt with a batch of matters challenging detention orders passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smugg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Compounding Fee Demand Under Section 96(4) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Want of Prior Conversion of Patta Land. Quarrying Activity Commenced When Law Did Not Require Conversion as per Shakeel Pasha v. N. Sivasailam, Hence No Violation of Section 95.

The petitioner, a mineral company holding three quarrying licences granted in 2000 and 2002 for extraction of pink granite on patta agricultural lands...