Search Results for "Bombay Stamp Act 1958"

322 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 322 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Wife and Co-Respondent, Upholds Divorce Decree on Grounds of Adultery, Desertion, and Cruelty Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Wife's Voluntary Sexual Intercourse with Co-Respondent and Desertion Established by Preponderance of Probabilities.

The case involves two family court appeals arising from a divorce petition filed by Sushil (husband) against Sangeeta (wife) under Section 13(1)(i), (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows PIL Seeking Prevention of Cow Slaughter in Non-Designated Places During Bakrid. Court Holds That Slaughter of Cows and Calves Must Only Occur in Designated Slaughterhouses Under Article 48 of the Constitution and Tamil Nadu Animal Preservation Act.

The petitioner, K. Surya alias K. Surya Prasanth, a resident of Coimbatore and an activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 12656 OF 2023

The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. against the order dated 31 July ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disqualification Under Section 14(h) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 for Non-Payment of House Tax — Holds That Disqualification Cannot Be Sustained When Tax Demand Was Not Proved to Be in Respect of the Member's Own House.

The petitioner, Ashok Bhimrao Mahure, was an elected member of the Gram Panchayat, Shendurjana Khurd, Taluq Tiwasa, District Amravati. The Gram Pancha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Upholding Suit for Possession After Symbolical Delivery in Execution; Plea of Non-Maintainability and Limitation Cannot Be Raised First Time in Second Appeal. Cross-Objection Held Maintainable After Admission of Appeal.

The litigation originated from a suit for possession, declaration, and damages regarding agricultural lands bearing Survey Nos. 1/2 and 54/3. The land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement Not Signed by Plaintiff Renders Suit Unenforceable. The court held that an agreement to sell not signed by the plaintiff seeking specific performance cannot be enforced, setting aside the decrees of the lower courts.

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court arising from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell. The original plai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Unregistered Lease Agreement — Section 35 of Stamp Act Bars Unstamped Agreement from Being Admitted in Evidence. Lease for Three Years Without Registration Invalid Under Section 107 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The appellant, Horizon Exhibitions And Events Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for possession of premises against the respondent, RMB Event Management Pvt. Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch for Interest in Contract with Gram Panchayat. Joint Ownership of Hotel Property with License from Panchayat Constitutes Interest in Contract Under Section 14(1)(j) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The Petitioner, Jijabai Tukaram Gaikwad, was elected as a member and later as Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat Takave (Budruk) in 2015. The Respondent N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Summary Suit — Defendant's Vague Defence of Security Cheques Not a Triable Issue. The court upheld the decree for Rs.61,00,000/- with interest under Order 37 CPC, as the defendant failed to disclose a plausible defence.

The respondent/plaintiff, Pravin Hiralal Shah, filed a summary suit against the appellant/defendant, Rajesh Laxmichand Udeshi @Bhatia, for recovery of...